主题:【原创】翻译讨论 -- 人间树
这儿有个网页还不错,尽管还是不够详尽:
http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/627/02/
摘一段:
If a participial phrase comes at the end of a sentence, a comma usually precedes the phrase if it modifies an earlier word in the sentence but not if the phrase directly follows the word it modifies.
* The local residents often saw Ken wandering through the streets.
(The phrase modifies Ken, not residents.)
* Tom nervously watched the woman, alarmed by her silence.
(The phrase modifies Tom, not woman.)
这个网页还列了几种分词的位置:
Participles and participial phrases must be placed as close to the nouns or pronouns they modify as possible, and those nouns or pronouns must be clearly stated.
A participial phrase is set off with commas when it:
* a) comes at the beginning of a sentence
* b) interrupts a sentence as a nonessential element
* c) comes at the end of a sentence and is separated from the word it modifies.
我对这个“as close as possible”比较感兴趣,显然,它说的不是“directly following”,这里面就有可能产生ambiguity。可惜这个网站讲得还不够详细,我手上也没有什么权威资料。只好作罢了。
至于那个具体的例子,我一开头就觉得老兄的理解是对的,只是多看几眼之后,又觉得有些ambiguous,就象盯着自己耳朵越看越觉得怪。
本帖一共被 1 帖 引用 (帖内工具实现)
- 相关回复 上下关系8
压缩 3 层
🙂诧异 2 人间树 字2050 2010-05-31 00:51:03
🙂怎么会对你指出的问题视而不见呢? 3 南方有嘉木 字3596 2010-06-01 04:20:00
🙂继续昨日的话: 3 南方有嘉木 字4412 2010-06-02 02:26:02
🙂关于分词的用法,加逗号应该是可以的,效果也有所不同
🙂其他就不说了 1 人间树 字612 2010-05-31 10:13:15
🙂那个应该不是状语 九霄环珮 字197 2010-05-31 11:06:30
🙂真是太神奇了 人间树 字1056 2010-05-31 23:32:26
🙂我还是说我比较有把握的吧 九霄环珮 字284 2010-06-01 08:39:08