西西河

主题:【原创】揭穿一个流传已久的谎话帖,关于美国持枪自由 -- zhang11

共:💬89 🌺104 新:
全看分页树展 · 主题 跟帖
家园 例子

我不知道是否有在不改变法律的情况下最高法院的法官改变以前的最高法院法官裁决的例子

最高法院的裁决不可上诉,所以以前的裁决被推翻是通过新的类似案例的裁决实现的。相信这是常识。最近一例请见

Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission

The decision completely overruled Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce (1990) and partially overruled McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003).[4]

Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce, 494 U.S. 652 (1990), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held the Michigan Campaign Finance act which prohibited corporations from using treasury money to support or oppose candidates in elections did not violate the First and Fourteenth Amendments.

McConnell v. Federal Election Commission, 540 U.S. 93 (2003)[1], is a case in which the United States Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of most of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002, often referred to as the McCain–Feingold Act.

全看分页树展 · 主题 跟帖


有趣有益,互惠互利;开阔视野,博采众长。
虚拟的网络,真实的人。天南地北客,相逢皆朋友

Copyright © cchere 西西河