主题：【讨论】在台湾问题上联邦制是否可行？ -- 锦候

The constitutions of the Soviet Union (USSR) adopted since 1924 theoretically provided for a voluntary federation or union of Soviet Socialist Republics (SSR).

这个是我给的关于联帮的链接外链出处上关于苏联的原话：

Soviet Union (USSR)

The constitutions of the Soviet Union (USSR) adopted since 1924 theoretically provided for a voluntary federation or union of Soviet Socialist Republics (SSR). Each was notionally governed by its own Supreme Soviet (parliament) and had the right to secede from the Union. Furthermore, some republics themselves possessed nominally self-governing units – Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republics (ASSR) or autonomous oblasts. Two of the USSR republics, Byelorussian SSR and Ukraine SSR, were even members of the United Nations in recognition of their role in World War II. In practice, the system of one-party government found in the Soviet Union meant that governance of the Union was highly centralised, with important decisions taken by the leaders of the Communist Party in Moscow and merely 'rubber stamped' by local institutions. Nonetheless, with the introduction of free, competitive elections in the final years of the Soviet Union, the Union's theoretically federal structure became a reality in practice. This occurred only for a brief interim period, as the elected governments of many republics demanded their right to secede and became independent states in 1991–1992. The Soviet Union's de jure federal structure played a key role in its dissolution.

到目前为止我所接触的所有的资料都认为苏联是个实际上的联邦国家，虽然名义上有邦联的说法，你要是认为苏联是邦联国家，这个就不是我的兴趣所在了。

而且邦联和联邦的最主要的区别不是成员国有没有退出的自由，而是有没有组成统一的中央政府，出台统一的宪法，这个很多人地认识都有偏差，网上的资料很多也很误导。

苏联的崩溃不是政治问题，是经济问题，不过这些都是个人看法了，也不是我要讨论的重点。

讨论这个问题试想进一步了解这个一国两制和联邦的区别，和坚持一国两制的理由，不是选边。我从来不认为大陆的利益受损失不可接受的，你错误的引申了我的话，我也不认为统一不需要付出代价。

我举香港的例子是说明一国两制的结果是两边都不太讨好，效果没有想象中的那么好，所有的政策都需要在实践的过程中不断的做出修改和调整，这样将来才可以做得更好，而不是抱残守缺看到不足和缺点也不做任何的改进。

我事实上很不喜欢很多人对台湾问题的态度，其实这些人现在的态度大概也就是台湾人对统一顾虑重重的原因。

你说的问题都很有意思，但是都不是我想讨论和了解的问题。谢谢再见!