主题：[原创]反对鼓吹暴力革命 -- jlanu
如果传统社会往往是一个两极社会，只有两个基本对立的利益集团，（农民vs.地主，工人vs.工厂主）。双方出现冲突，只有比体力，一个集团把另一个集团用暴力镇压下去。
如果一个社会，用专用名词叫CIVIL SOCIETY，有多元化的利益集团，没有一个集团的力量可以主宰局势，那么大家必须在合作中竞争，在妥协中共存。这是民主出现的社会基础。
市场经济把劳动分工推到极端，对两极社会能产生巨大的分化作用，使利益集团多元化。这是中国目前道路和方向带来的希望。
本帖一共被 1 帖 引用 (帖内工具实现)
It's a good article, but I think it missed 温相's point. He is not 鼓吹暴力革命, but just against a point which is quite popular now. 暴力革命 is always a choice for lowest level people to against their ruler, and in history, unfortunately it seems like it's the only way that can work. So against 暴力革命 sometimes is against the last right of poor people.
Also one popular idea is always think 革命 as a kind of idealism, think 革命者 is high in moral standard, that's absolutely not true. 革命 is just another way to redistribute the polition power and economic beneficial. Although a lot of time it represents most people will, it's not necessary high in morality. Also the 革命 can be successful most time depends on the organization efficiency and correct polition and economic policy, not depends on only morality. 革命 actually is always majority's success.
我只是担心，如果我们还热衷于宣扬暴力革命，很有可能我们自己或我们的子孙会再一次被它吞噬掉。让我们还是远离它吧。
“in history, unfortunately it seems like it's the only way that can work.“ 我想加上“在中国的历史上“ 这个定语可能会恰当一些吧。引一段风声兄的话http://www.cchere.com/article/100;ID=82561
我只是希望我的祖国永远安定昌盛，一路平安。
I don't think it's just Chinese history, in Greek, in Roman, in France or even in so called peaceful revolution England, that's just so many these kinds of examples. Just in Medieval the civilians are not strong enough as in China, so it's not so obvious. But if you think from the nation and religion instead of just civilians, it's basically the same.
I really against the bloody revolution because generally civilians will suffer much more. However, now when a lot of so called elite talk about that, they are afraid of the power from poor people, they are depriving the last right of poor people. But if they don't do much to change the unfair society, the revolution will not be avoided.
还有，社会精英这个用词很模糊。好像没有一个明确的定义。继而对他们行为的讨论就显得没有什么意义。