主题：阿桑奇和中国 -- 晨枫

First of all, I said "could be the case", not "must be the case". :-)

It's not about westerners like China or not, but care or not. I'm talking about average people. For a rough example, of the two topics below, which one do you think more likely appears on China's news circulation?

* David Beckham's hair style change

* The corruption in Syria

As I see it, the wikileaks is more about letting people see what their governments are cooking in the dark. It's more about what people (mostly English readers) would like to see. Not to mention most Chinese are not even able to access wikileaks thanks to the censorship.

UK readers may care about the former more. However, this is apple and orange. Unless you talk about tabloid papers, "evil China" can appear in front page but Beckham's hair style does not belong there. Which do you suppose average western readers care about more?

average Chinese care more about U.S./Europe than Middle East. By the same token, average westerners (not just British) would care more about Beckham's hair style than what's going on in China. This is where we diverge. :-)

This is changing as China grow stronger over time, but not yet as much as most Chinese think. Also it depends on where you are to realize that. Don't want to go too long, coz it's not the topic of this thread.

been anti-U.S. for long, on too many things. It's the English government that has been taking side with U.S. for the nation's best interest.

上次看到有十几个g，懒得弄。

这个事情确实很奇怪。

“I,温阁老”的意思？

History often repeats itself. Human natures are still fundamentally the same, even generations later.

国际政治系这个样子：

丫把桌子掀了，介怎么行捏？拿下！

陆克文这样的就如同被扒光了衣服, 下次再有看到他, 他也许其实真的满脸堆笑,可你还是觉得他没穿衣服, 而且,他也很可悲,因为他自打这以后,真的认为自己没穿了..

这..这..这..让人情何以堪啊..."让人家以后怎么做人啊"? 羞煞奴家了啊...

做反对党没有活路

三少可能被收编了，就象家康吃了败仗后被秀吉收编一样。