主题：【讨论】对总经理述职报告的部分内容的简单解读 -- wqnsihs
同意你对郎的评价。你的评价是中肯的恰当的，尤其是这几句：郎咸平对中国企业，就像一个持不同政见者，只有批评，没有建议，只有唱衰，没有激励。朗的错误就是舍本求末，安他的说法中国早就完蛋了一百万次了，呵呵。他最大的错误老是觉得西方国家的智慧是完美的标准的，其它国家只能按西方国家的所谓标准执行衡量，忽视了东方智慧不一定比所谓西方智慧差.......。
恭喜：你意外获得【通宝】一枚
鲜花已经成功送出，可通过工具取消
提示：此次送花为此次送花为【有效送花赞扬，涨乐善、声望】。
现在‘那些人’也一样，图的是小集团利益。
流体力学的定理还是基本上适用于金融的流动性理论的
小河---中小企业的资金干涸了----而这种严峻的情况至少前些年没有出现过，这就说明了流动性不足了
与流体力学一样，大河的水位升高的话，必然的小河的水位也会升高，大型企业的资金充裕了，它们也就会有更多的资金和冲动将资金转贷给中小企业
当然，中小企业的资金短缺与部分大型企业获得资金以后将资金投入到资本市场和房地产市场，从而导致原来流向中小企业的资金被分流有关系，这说明股票市场和房地产市场的监管需要加强力度
and do not have the capability to lead the world yet.
China should solve its internal injustice, inequality and income disparity first before any global ambition. Without domestic peace, it can not even be a sound regional leader at all.
Start your empire slowly. America first controlled North/Latin America, before it landed on a global empire path.
http://www.ccthere.com/article/2553383
For a nation that still can not build a car motor by itself, 30-year growth is just one small step towards better global status. The key now is to improve the life of its own citizens.
"Obey before you command"
"Learn before you lead"-okay?
China is still a primary school student, though very diligent. DO NOT WASTE TIME DREAMING OF REPLACING THIS AMERICA-LED system. China could not create a better system to lead the world, even at the regional level(it has no expertise in empire-building as well as economic management. Look at its 2009 man-made real estate bubble and 2010 hyperinflation... Can not help shaking my head at this kind of stupidity). Further disruption of the current global system will bring in large fall in global output and living standards.
http://www.ccthere.com/article/2620776
http://www.ccthere.com/article/2595070
Read the 3rd last paragraph.
After WWII, the world is short of global trade payment tool and America is still an trade surplus nation. How to promote global trade and recovery in Europe with constant surplus? Americans created Marshall plan, World Bank and IMF to finance global trade payment. That's something nobody tried before.
Think creatively. That's American's strength and Asian's weakness. Asians are still obsessed with physical gold now.
Again, under the America-led global division-of-labor system, the world has reached its output/efficiency/world-trade/employment/GDP-level/min-inflation PEAK.
After peak, YOU SHOULD PRAY THAT THE CONTRACTION IS SLOW AND LESS PAINFUL. If we got a 1929-1931 contraction of 25% to 30%, then you will only see war in the end.
I can only pray that technology revolution come a bit early so that productive capacity destruction will not happen. While, it is in God's hand now.
Up till now, Federal Reserve has handled the financial matters with great capability, in comparison with its performance in 1929-1931. When it comes to finance, nobody can beat American WASP-Jewish elites. You know empire hisotry well, any nation without the sincere assistance of Jewish bankers will not achieve its empire dream.
So is China. An Chinese empire can not be built purely by Chinese talents, let alone China has lost lots of its own talents to the outside world and still is still so mean to its own compatriots.
呵呵,完全看不出你的道理,你是如何从"普通劳动密集型出口企业的管理员工和工人的比例大概是1:10"推导出"也就是说解决一个大学生就业需要10个普工"的?今天的大学生就业问题很大的原因在与他们自身的素质不行而不是没有10个普工来让他们管理.如果象你这样来考虑,那哪里还有就业问题啊,600万大学生就意味着6600万个工作啊,连农民问题都可以顺带解决,多容易啊.
你的问题就在于想当然的认为大学生就应该是"管理员"就不能做"普工",其实不仅是你,很多的人都是这样的,所以你找不到那么多普通工人,所以"85后的年轻人有几个愿意当普工的?"85后的年轻人有几个不是大学生的?不做普工很正常的唠.
中国的就业问题由来已久,根本就不是几百万大学生这么简单的,单独把这个群体突显出来只是转移一下注意力罢了,真的被忽悠了,目的也就达到了,至于其他的,谁管?
在四十年前,那场红遍中国大地的运动已经种下民族觉醒的种子,这颗种子一定会发芽,常凯申注定只能说不是党国无能,而是...太狡猾。
就俺所知，很多中小企业缺的不是钱，而是好项目。没有在自己能力范围内、能够产生足够利润的项目，要资金干嘛？给自己找麻烦？资金是有成本滴。
有很多民营企业，在过去依靠劳动密集型产业积累了一定的资金。但随着产业形势的变化，原有产业已不大挣钱，但因为所有者自身的经验、知识，对一些新兴产业认识又不充分，不大敢投入。对所有者而言，好项目意味着：有好的利润和自己能够掌控。
有钱没“好项目”的情况是普遍的。很多这类所有者最后把钱投入房地产也是这个原因，因为炒楼比较江湖。
“中小企业的资金干涸了”-- 这个不是实事。耸人听闻罢了。不过谢谢化生， 有点不同意见，比较容易激化思考。
做个记号，方便追踪阅读
“我不是个预言家，我没料到5月份会发生汶川特大地震，我也没料到紧随着而来的金融风波袭击中国”
http://opinion.huanqiu.com/roll/2010-01/676465.html
今天刚看到，雷。
和对准确性的信心. 世界上谁有这本事,甭多,一次,他(她)就能把自己整成亿万富豪.根本不用屈尊当"智囊"或经济学家.
这位parishg说的东西还是有一些信息量的。当然咱是局外人，无法评价。
如果你让中国最好的几所学校的学生去超市当收银员，你还会看到他们很务实吗？