主题:【文摘】法国的太子党 -- 我爱莫扎特
the problem is that most Chinese do not have opportunity to live among them and understand the large cultural differences there.
As I said before, war between nations is the war between 精英 of those nations. It is a competition of industrial power, political solidarity, public administration, diplomatic alliance, economic resources--and most importantly, those are all managed by political/military/economic 精英.
公民权不仅仅是权利--should be changed to 贵族/精英 权 or title 不仅仅是权利
Some Chinese now become very rich and start to pretend to be 贵族. But they do not understand aristcracy means not womanizing, nights of lavish dinners, global fashion brands, and reckless sex, more importantly, it implies social responsibility. When your country faces military or economic challenges, you should be the front man to lead the charge and quite possibly, enjoy the first bullet!
What Tiger implies here is 尚武精神, which is in the blood of Anglo-Saxon elites/people. Saxons even defeated Roman Empire at Teutoburg forest and throughout the history, Roman empire did not dare to cross the Danube River (多瑙河).
当我看到《华氏911》中介绍美国议员子女参战情况时,我就知道这个国家的这届政府道德基础已经沦丧,政治上破产经济上崩溃是迟早的事。尽管有信息革命之功,艰难险阻就在眼前。
--Yes and no. Yes, because the honor code is fading in America.
WASP elites are just like their British counterparts. Those WASP east-coast families used to stick to this British tradition, that's why so many sons of senators/congressmen did lose their lives in WWII. But America changed its military recruiting policies after Vietnam war, now, military service is no longer mandatory like in the ancient Rome empire. People are no longer proud of military service. This country is slipping into Carthagian way: pay high prices to attract all kinds of trash to stuff the ranks of the army, more like a mercenary army now. The Iraq war made it even worse.
No, because《华氏911》quoted wrong figure: he covers only the 100 senators, not all the Congressmen. Sons of some Congressmen do serve in the army, navy or air force.
使得皇室和社会名流阶层不得不前赴后继地参战,否则就有亡国之危。远的比如阿金库尔战役中战死的约克公爵。近的如两次大战,英国贵族的参战率和死亡率都是普通国民的10倍。再如马岛之战,
--Yes. Thumbs up. I know that too. That's why I respect the british aristcrats more than the French ones.
这个岛上的绅士淑女战士将军流氓土匪酒鬼赌徒们,就是穷到了只有一条裤子,也是中国争霸世界的劲敌。
--hehe, 酒鬼赌徒们 should be excluded. Agree with your comments! Chinese just rich up in the last 20 years and still underestimate their competitors.
Britons(esp., the English, not including Irishmen or Scots) defeated Portugese, Spaniards, Dutchmen, Frenchmen, Germans, Chinese, many small Asian nations in the last 300 years. Britons won the North American continent though they were repeatedly defeated by the French in the 7-years war.
Their allies include most commonwealth nations, their Austrlian, American and Canadian cousins, all Nordic nations (yes! go and learn the industrialization history), Benelux friends(created by British diplomats, Belgian king was from England), India, Hong Kong...
Japan was its student, Germany share the common Saxon link with it and was actually sponsored by England before 1870s.
A small island nation that maintained a global empire for more than 200 years--if one nation underestimate such a nation with contempt, then history will give this nation a harsh lesson.
Last comment: UK's only challenge now is its large gov. debt and shabby financial system. But in terms of national defense, it is more than strong enough to compel any military challenge.
hehe, btw, google search on Shan Wu Jing Shen
尚武精神_互动百科
难以想象日不落的海上贸易如果缺少了军事力量的支撑那会是怎么样的;难以想象经济、科技实力雄厚的大宋王朝如果拥有了一种坚定的尚武精神那历史又将如何。 ...
比如中国文化 天行健 君子自强不息 这样理念的传承
这些都是一种内在的文化特质 这样隐藏在血液中的内在能量
是发展 是革命 是再发展 再革命 的根本要素
这些要素是根 是很一个民族和国家很难短时间改变的 而工业化则是一种制度 一种社会组织的架构 是有可能短时间适应的
例子印度VS中国 2种不同的民族文化 造成了现在完全不一样的国家环境。当然很多客观原因也是非常重要的,这就是我用可能的原因。
您可否详谈?
会有所转变。
您可否详谈?
那一个个鬼灵精的,哪里是墙头草,随风说说就倒.
泼墨门诈捐门双子高楼我是从头跟的.无数mm被推到CNN的怀抱这个结论是你自己臆断的吧.要不你把这句扔高楼里听听大家反响.北美华人网也别落下.
别小瞧天涯八卦女的三观和判断能力.更别总高看自己一头,代表总结他人的观点是需要一点水平滴,光口气大没用
贴了几张图,可惜看不了,删了。
误扔蛋,可糟糕了。。。
那请问现在一位越南MM的身价是多少呢?
越南也建国60年了,南北统一也30多年了,那么越南人的生活和60年前又有什么不同呢?台湾、香港等地区的女人,60年前后又有什么不同呢?
被理想主义者制肘了几十年才爆发也算奇迹了.
[URL=http://news.qq.com/a/20100221/000354.htm][/URL]
如此密集、年轻的安插后辈,对以后的公务员队伍可不利啊
再过若干年,或许新的阶级分化将愈加明显