主题：文革是如何演绎成一场国难的 -- 潘涌
当年不够年龄听文件传达，等有机会看到《五七一工程纪要》时，感觉讲得对极了，但又觉得这是对老毛极大的不忠，矛盾矣~
如果毛岸英没在朝鲜战场上挂了，那么30年前还能改革开放么？现在是否还会和朝鲜一样？
毛岸英挂了，未必不是中国之大幸也。
假如毛岸英没挂，毛之后给小毛，邓，叶等尚在，如何保证不把毛岸英废黜了？
建议您将来进一步完善后结集出版，这将是非常珍贵的史料，可以帮助后人理解你们这一代人是如何看待文革，以及如何影响文革之后的历史进程的。
虽然我完全不同意您的观点。
平稳交权，台湾就是一个很好的例子。当然世界还要发展，关键是君王自己能不能走出这一步。因为任何时代都有一批吹喇叭太轿子的，这些人是祸根。
Politicale struggle is the same as playing cards, and needs to know each other.
潘大哥,读您的文字让我想起当年的伤痕文学.前车之鉴,后车之师.如果岸英当真继位,中国和现今的小金政权又有什么区别?老毛的不幸,给中国人民带来暂时的不幸(十年动乱),却为将来的改革埋下了种子,这才是我们70s,80s,90s的大幸,您觉得呢?
It might help you to figure a big work about those gambles happened in Chinese history. All those big guys appeared in the political stage of China, were all gamblers. They in fact could be called a good gambler because they fought to last minute of their lives, no matter M, Liu, lin, Zhou, Hua, who was just gone, or gang of Four. For gamblers, no mercies, no love, all those through their lives are games. They were born for games. Either win the game, or lose life for the game.
I guess you might mistunderstand Pan Ge's intension. If I am not wrong, PanGe thinks China can avoid that the most overwhelming disaster started in 1966 and lasted for ten years if Xiao Mao could have taken over Mao's power.
Also, if Xiao Mao could be able in charge of China, China won't be neccessary to resemble current N. Korea. Setting aside of personal abilities, XiaoMao at least have more cards in hands than Xiao Jin.
早在第一篇就开宗明义的阐述过.曾经有人无奈的为文革"辩解",社会主义国家建国后都逃脱不了肃反和大清洗,苏联,朝鲜,中国,越南几乎都逃不脱这个怪圈.撇开这个消极的论调,中国一朝天子一朝臣的宿命,也注定在上层集团内会有一场清洗,杯酒释兵权的典故将会重演.
也许老百姓受到的冲击会小很多,可谁又知道持续的时间会多长.
Well, my opionion is it is so everywhere.
It is true
however it won't be so violent, and bloodshedding. After a game, cards need be washed. The cost of washing cards is getting smaller and smaller.
Also, it is not a problem of system. Those who breaks rules will be cleaned out.
经过几轮洗牌,该出局的出局,中国人民再次和谐的生活着.搞了半天,胡温费了那么大劲,还不如岸英在父亲的提协下打几圈牌有效.也许腥风血雨被滞后,但谁都无法保证不会发生.
试问,你是否愿意在这样一个和谐社会生活,还是接受文革的既定事实,放下包袱,一起创造出胡温体制下的和谐制度,并把最高领导人权力移交制度化传承下去.
我选择后者