- 程序有所改变。发帖如还有问题请报告
- 【征集】西西河的经济学,及清流措施,需要主动参与者,『稷下学宫』新认证方式,24年网站打算和努力目标
主题:中国网民的全面反击 -- evilpanda
虽然还是死鸭子嘴硬,但是他们已经不能无视中国网民的反击了。呼吁继续努力,发出我们的声音。支持www.anti-cnn.com这样的网站。
在google搜china netizens fight back。
加拿大网站
http://www.canada.com/saskatoonstarphoenix/news/world/story.html?id=8cf60f98-8c0f-4616-bae7-dc0ff22effec
时代杂志
http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1725650,00.html
华尔街日报
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120646920789362907.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
ABC电视台
http://abcnews.go.com/International/story?id=4527014&page=1
另外,有没有兄弟能够把youtube封锁大陆ip的证据传出去。这些wbd一口咬定是天朝封的,要是有证据是他们封的,youtube起码得丢个大脸。
http://abcnews.go.com/International/comments?type=story&id=4527014
Dear Stephanie,Why do you call a campaign that uses UNCROPPED PICTURES AND CORRECT CAPTIONS propaganda, and call the artistically CROPPED pictures and WRONGLY captioned articles, not unlike your own, journalist reporting? Why do you assume that WE cannot think independently?Why do you play down the CONFIRMED murder of the innocent Tibetants and Hans and Hui Chineses, and instead put it on par with the unsubstantiated claim of 122 death number FED TO YOU by the Dalai Clique?Why do you refuse to call those who violently assualted, burnt, destroyed, murdered, rioters? Why do you, in you haughty voice, keep trying to deny that Chinese Netizens work this out on our own? Why? Because we can't think? Because we can't go outside of China and collect information on our own? How dare you proclaim that "This was the only version of events people in China saw." If that was the only version, why would we be so furious about your propaganda? You claimed "First, as journalists, we try to hear what all sides are saying and fashion what we believe to be the closest thing to the truth from that. ". But have you actually done this? There had been first handed account of Tourist from Norway who video taped the riots. If this is not the cloest thing to the truth, WHAT IS? The transcript from Dalai's speaker? Admit it, you are prejudiced against Chinese. You have taken a stand before you write down your first note. You, madam, is NOT a journalist. You are no better than the Chinese state media you accused of. Your writing is unfair, biased, and full of logical holes. Best RegardsEvil Panda
Posted by:
evilpanda77 5:43 AM
Mark As Violation
怎么说那,是一个智能型的封锁路由,发现关键字眼就掐断...... 最近可能 tibet被加进去了
不过,youtobe也做了手脚,把那几个对西媒不理的视频的浏览数删掉了,这样视频上不了首页,可以说美国的舆论控制比中国强很多
可惜找不到连接。
但是没有什么技术手段可以确定是在什么位置进行的拦截,不过tg确实有个gfw,所以大家都爱往那找
手里仅有的民主权力,这西方媒体立马翻脸不认地称之为“被政府雇佣的”、“被洗脑”的。
假若是民主的挺政府,而且是万恶不赦的土共,那一定是被洗脑了。
那帮XX脑里也就容得下这点逻辑。还不知道是谁被洗脑了呢?
不知道是谁在封锁谁,我现在在美国弗吉尼亚,
家里的和办公室的都试过了,都上不去,很奇怪。
链接:外链出处
我在在枫叶国土狼屯