主题:有人看过最近ECONOMIST的一篇关于新经济秩序的文章 -- 远航
Financial wobbles this summer acted as a reminder that
emerging economies are more volatile than rich-country ones;
yet their long-run prospects look excellent, so long as they
continue to move towards free and open markets, sound fiscal
and monetary policies and better education. Because they start
with much less capital per worker than developed economies, they have huge scope for boosting
productivity by importing Western machinery and know-how. Catching up is easier than being a leader.
When America and Britain were industrialising in the 19th century, they took 50 years to double their real
incomes per head; today China is achieving the same feat in nine years.
What's new
Emerging economies as a group have been growing faster than developed economies for several
decades. So why are they now making so much more of a difference to the old rich world? The first
reason is that the gap in growth rates between the old and the new world has widened (see chart 3). But
more important, emerging economies have become more integrated into the global system of production,
with trade and capital flows accelerating relative to GDP in the past ten years.
China joined the World Trade Organisation only in 2001. It is
having a bigger global impact than other emerging economies
because of its vast size and its unusual openness to trade and
investment with the rest of the world. The sum of China's totalexports and imports amounts to around 70% of its GDP,
against only 25-30% in India or America. By next year, China is
likely to account for 10% of world trade, up from 4% in 2000.
What is also new is that the internet has made it possible
radically to reorganise production across borders. Thanks to
information technology, many once non-tradable services, such
as accounting, can be provided from afar, exposing more
sectors in the developed world to competition from India and
elsewhere.
Faster growth that lifts the living standards of hundreds of
millions of people in poor countries should be a cause for
celebration. Instead, many bosses, workers and politicians in
the rich world are quaking in their boots as output and jobs
shift to low-wage economies in Asia or eastern Europe. Yet on
balance, rich countries should gain from poorer ones getting
richer. The success of the emerging economies will boost both
global demand and supply.
Rising exports give developing countries more money to spend on imports from richer ones. And
although their average incomes are still low, their middle classes are expanding fast, creating a vast new
market. Over the next decade, almost a billion new consumers will enter the global marketplace as
household incomes rise above the threshold at which people generally begin to spend on non-essential
goods. Emerging economies have already become important markets for rich-world firms: over half of
the combined exports of America, the euro area and Japan go to these poorer economies. The rich
economies' trade with developing countries is growing twice as fast as their trade with one another.
The future boost to demand will be large. But more important in the long term will be the stimulus to the
world economy from what economists call a “positive supply shock”. As China, India and the former
Soviet Union have embraced market capitalism, the global labour force has, in effect, doubled. The
world's potential output is also being lifted by rapid productivity gains in developing countries as they try
to catch up with the West.
This increased vitality in emerging economies is raising global growth, not substituting for output
elsewhere. The newcomers boost real incomes in the rich world by supplying cheaper goods, such as
microwave ovens and computers, by allowing multinational firms to reap bigger economies of scale, and
by spurring productivity growth through increased competition. They will thus help to lift growth in world
GDP just when the rich world's greying populations would otherwise cause it to slow. Developed countries
will do better from being part of this fast-growing world than from trying to cling on to a bigger share of
a slow-growing one.
Stronger growth in emerging economies will make developed countries as a whole better off, but not
everybody will be a winner. The integration of China and other developing countries into the world
trading system is causing the biggest shift in relative prices and incomes (of labour, capital, commodities,
goods and assets) for at least a century, and this, in turn, is leading to a big redistribution of income. For
example, whereas prices of the labour-intensive goods that China and others export are falling, prices of
the goods they import, notably oil, are rising.
- 相关回复 上下关系8
🙂这里是英文全文 2 verb 字2889 2006-09-28 03:38:40
🙂谢了!能否把更长的那部分找到? 远航 字125 2006-09-28 09:35:54
🙂打不开,可否把内容转过来? rtf0 字0 2006-09-28 02:25:10
🙂有人看过最近ECONOMIST的一篇关于新经济的文章吗? 远航 字27 2006-09-27 22:50:57