西西河

主题:【信息流行病】新冠超额死亡数据的悖论 -- 夕曦

共:💬34 🌺161 🌵1
全看分页树展 · 主题 跟帖
家园 JAMA论文中的超额死亡

即excess deaths/mortality,跟你的定义不一样:

The COVID-19 pandemic has produced excess deaths, the number of all-cause fatalities exceeding the expected number in any period.

We applied autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) models to US Census populations (2014-2019) and seasonal ARIMA (sARIMA) models to Massachusetts

Department of Health all-cause mortality statistics (from January 5, 2015, through February 8, 2020) to account for prepandemic age and mortality trends and to project the age stratified (0-17, 18-49, 50-64,and≥65 years) weekly population and the weekly number of expected deaths in Massachusetts during the pandemic period

Excess mortality for each period was defined as the difference between the observed deaths and point estimate for sARIMA-determined expected deaths.

超额死亡是实际死亡与预期死亡之差。这里的预期死亡(expected deaths)是基于疫情前的数字,应该不包括疫情直接死亡, 不然就得不出论文的结论:

Others have reported that the Omicron variant may cause milder COVID-19. If true, increased all-cause excess mortality observed during the Omicron wave in Massachusetts may reflect a higher mortality product (ie, a moderately lower infection fatality rate multiplied by far higher infection rate).

the present findings indicate that a highly contagious (although relatively milder) SARS-CoV-2 variant can quickly confer substantial excess mortality, even in a highly vaccinated and increasingly immune population.

全看分页树展 · 主题 跟帖


有趣有益,互惠互利;开阔视野,博采众长。
虚拟的网络,真实的人。天南地北客,相逢皆朋友

Copyright © cchere 西西河