主题:从狭义相对论公式看当物体超光速的时候,是否是会时光倒流? -- 思想的行者
"一个国家的真正崛起,是意识形态的崛起,中国能举起自由民主的大旗,还举得的比美国更高么?绝无可能,那么中国要构建怎样的意识形态呢?是儒家,是佛教,还是毛主义?这将是决定中国未来的根本。"
http://www.ccthere.com/article/4001954
this is obviously a huge topic;
without getting sucked too much into it (obviously the whole china is pretty much sucked into this thing every day), I am just going to ask a few basic methodology type of questions or modeling issues, as food for thoughts, not really arguing, using some analogies.
1.
as we all know, in today's increasingly globalized world, 意识形态 is not one nation's thing, particularly for big country like china, it is a global thing, much like the a commercial service or product: what matters is not how much you like it yourself, it is all about: can you make other people or the whole world 1) knows or pay attention to your product; 2) eventually, like your product; 3) pay a good price (hopefully a premium) to use your product
do you have a plan or model to accomplish all the above? do you have resources? what is your time line?
and any further back up/hedge plan in case of things going wrong big time?
and we do know, in terms of social science, things do go wrong, often big time, and bloody.
if not, what are you going to do?
2.
as I posted before, for 意识形态, the above line of logic or modeling is even more important, because as a nation, you are basically gambling with your almost entire inventory of resources.
as I posted before, there are no easy answers/solutions for this almost life/death kind of 意识形态 challenge for Chinese as a nation, due to all kinds of reasons as I posted before;
what I am really talking about is modeling, should a person or nation start modeling process first, for any serious challenges, before jumping into river with your two foot, with "摸著石頭過河”
BS theory(:)?
3.
as posted before & because of many known reasons, the Chinese nation has this big family mentality: the political elite kind of lead & manages the Chinese people as the elites are parents, and ordinary people kind of like kids, 听大人话家长话, already for over 5k years?
中央在下一盘很大的棋, 我們的對手 is not uncle sam or jpy, we are doing....
团结 under 中央, 天大的困难也能战胜...
what a world, again, as I said, today more & more people don't really care: what they really want to is to suck their share of money out of TG"中央在下一盘很大的棋".
why not?(:)
then how do you 提高劳动生产率 as a nation if everybody wants to make quick and dirty money out of the system by 套利交易?
yes, we are going to 改革, again, where is your model of logic? not just a bunch of emotion invoking slogans.
4.
for the foreseeable future, TG is going to keep working on 构建中国的意识形态/中国特色社会主义 anyway, regardless, with GFW as some kind of 絕熱近似 from the rest of the world, or TGchina may fall apart yesterday;
with GFW, TG senior elite traders are going to 套利交易 in & out of GFW, sucking tons of money out of TGchina system, as they have been doing.
5.
I have read many good posts here, really helpful, and I hope my 2 cents can be food for thoughts as well for others, again, in terms of modeling.
- 相关回复 上下关系8
压缩 2 层
🙂您是建议我了解一下无克隆定理或者无通信定理? 测不到的信号 字659 2014-04-23 21:09:22
🙂你见得多了,不见得你就了解了量子纠缠和量子通信之间的关系 思想的行者 字122 2014-04-24 06:39:47
🙂Alice通过经典通道把测量结果告知bob:不可能超光速 晓兵 字6137 2014-04-24 12:07:14
🙂"一个国家的真正崛起,是意识形态的崛起"
🙂微观系统"絕熱": "超光速"意義不同 晓兵 字2921 2014-04-21 01:01:15
🙂不可能同时,物质不可能是绝对刚性的 桥上 字0 2014-04-18 02:15:45
🙂传导速度仅仅是该材料中的声波速度而已。 2 友来有趣 字0 2014-04-17 22:57:56
🙂轮子再大,如果角速度不够大的话,线速度也不会大 1 思想的行者 字270 2014-04-17 12:30:37