西西河

主题:【原创】近代自然科学禀性探讨(一) -- witten1

共:💬46 🌺164 🌵1
全看分页树展 · 主题 跟帖
家园 理性基础="物理数学逻辑化", "效用"物理数学逻辑化

1.

经济学金融学"效用"的理性基础: 量子力学大师诺伊曼 and a few other 大师 analyzed 人們 logic in gambling game, gamblers pay much more attention to 收益率 than the absolute payoff or winning dollar amounts, 收益率 is more important: the payoff vs your investment, 收益率收斂, you can use math/physics models to analyze it, with that they kind of provided 理性基础 for "效用";

2.

now, we can conceptually connect 收益率 to 物理学最小作用量原理, and from there on, we can further "extend" out:

理性流=能量信息流="信息作用"收益流=流形上的哈密顿流。该哈密顿向量场的一个积分曲线是一个流形的变换的单参数族;该曲线的参数通常称为时间。该时间的演变由辛同胚给出。根据刘维尔定理每个辛同胚保持相空间的体积形式不变。由哈密顿流到处的辛同胚的族通常称为哈密顿系统的哈密顿力学",

"逻辑就是必然要发生的".

now, is "理性流=能量信息流" 客观 or 主观 or both? it does not matter anymore, as long as it works; and in actual works including those social science working field, you collect 信息, you work on it, you progress, and statistically and socially, as a some kind of curve which is 單調, right continuous, integrable, measurable, "理性" and mathematically analyzable, etc;

3. 政治上"大多数有用吗?" vs 密度泛函理论 [ 晓兵 ]

http://www.ccthere.com/article/3907849

those "white" 公知 concept/logic: are they "right or "wrong" in the mainland Chinese context as we know?

it does not matter, once they become "influential" in the mainstream of Chinese society, it will start "working" as "理性流=能量信息流"/哈密顿流, and 哈密顿流's 傳播 is not easy to stop, it will get squeezed or twisted, but 傳播 continues, it is basically impossible to 屏蔽能量傳播, 熱力學 "works" very well on human beings;

4. do Chinese political top understand the above?

from sina's weibo.com

http://www.weibo.com/u/2623459265

"@在水一方风铃草 (维权金融女海归。曾在最发达国家服务于全球最大金融机构,也曾到最落后国家投资世界最大未开发..)

【实名控告戴相龙涉嫌非法挪用50亿社保基金】社保明知鼎晖违反忠诚条款,却将20亿交其管理;后又在鼎晖总裁焦震违法犯罪情况下交30亿给鼎晖。触犯刑法第185、272条。社保对我举报焦震偷取社保等24亿装聋作哑,被我起诉后在法庭做伪证,对新华社说谎。图附铁证。请习大大关注@学习粉丝团@胡舒立@陶景洲 "

-----------------

there would be more and more this kind of 实名控告 exposing the higher and higher level of Chinese political top, what to do with it? would it would become?

we all know it is Mr Deng who started this whole china open up/"海归" thing, and in the process, Chinese political top got tons of $USD for the country, and a "lot" for themselves/their families as well, but nothing is free, coming with $USD is also

those evil white" 公知 concept/logic:公民密度 etc

how does Chinese political top handles those "bad" stuff and only keep $USD? not easy, the way Mr X was educated, the way he is currently moving around: it is becoming an increasingly difficult job for him;

practically speaking, it is kind of understandable: for china political top, the window for Chinese political fundamental reform may have been closed, with so much money/人命关天 at stake, it is very difficult if not impossible for Chinese political top to loose the grip on the absolute power of the country: you just can not even loose a little bit political power in the name of playing some kind of "reform" games: politics in china has now become a zero sum game: you either have the total power or you don't have anything left for the top elite, the payoff/outcome of "class struggle" is almost like either heaven or hell, and there is no between, typical Chinese way of past 5k years惯性系: 阶级斗争, 你死我活.

5. 理性基础 of "west" "公民密度"代理人 & 三权分立

"电子密度" vs 公民密度

in west system, 公民 got votes in a 三权分立 system, "公民密度"代理人 are "fooling" around with their 代理人 own interests/私貨 and "公民密度"s interests mingled together, ...etc, you can kind of guess 波函数解概率分布, for major political issues, such as in USA.

how "good" the west political system is? relative to what? nobody knows. But for a functional society, west political system's value may be more in its stability and predictability, for individual citizens, for businesses, and for those "公民密度"代理人 players themselves;

similarly, very often, 数学方程解=物理系統穩定態.

is this as some kind of 普世理性基础 for the politics game of a modern society?

全看分页树展 · 主题 跟帖


有趣有益,互惠互利;开阔视野,博采众长。
虚拟的网络,真实的人。天南地北客,相逢皆朋友

Copyright © cchere 西西河