西西河

主题:【原创】围绕脑科学而发生的若干玄想 -- 鸿乾

共:💬461 🌺824 🌵2
全看分页树展 · 主题 跟帖
家园 the other 角度: 社会集體測度学

智能的本质 as a 社会集體认知系统, as opposed to that of a individual(but obviously we have to study individual 认知系统 as well);

for example: us 社会集體认知系统, how come that republican vp presidential candidate has been republican's top ticket? I listened to him 社会集體once on tv about his red neck econ logic, a joke;

obviously, there are many us systematic reasons, good and bad, tons of reasons there to explain things like this, but it also tells us that: politically, us 社会集體认知系统 pays huge cost in collecting and analyzing information for voters of a supposedly a democratic society of a global manager/leader, can AI provides a better model not to replace the current media/political campaign/brain washing(huge amount of money spent), but at least to help voters to be politically less stupid?

answer is: not, we have not even figured that out in economics, not to mention politics;

as an result of those "non-scientific" or 偽科學 nature of the current market economics and democratic politics almost globally, those "smarty" top social scientists took advantage of the current 带病上岗 system, and figured out how to brain wash and lead the "crowd" by family coaching, practicing/learning and a lot of luck, and become society's top leaders, and with 惯性, once top social scientists=4 ever, globally, and "real" scientists ended up as part of tool kit for those top social scientists, with a modest payroll, almost like Europe a couple of hundred years ago? when church leaders=top social scientists, at least co-managing the society, running the show for the mass;

tg's route is a little bit different, tg actually inherited and developed 馬列's whole series of models about 社会集體认知系统 and crowd's 觉悟系统 in particular, and that is part of reasons why tg is such a super effective social management organization of 1.5billion people, with all the "cost" discounted, tg inc is still highly profitable, low pe ratio stock, and everybody still loves it, even with the possible "double top" chart.

and the white can never figure that out, how come? as I said before, the current white never really understand their other white cousins 馬列's super models about 社会集體认知系统 and crowd's 觉悟系统, among other 馬列's models;

in terms of that kind of game, the white is too simple, too nave, way behind tg;

so unless white can figure out a new round technology break through based strong economic growth of many years, white will 自顧不暇 for long time, they will be too busy handling the class struggle between the crowd and elite in their society;

as a result, they will need tg's help from time to time in managing many international issues, and most importantly the Chinese market;

I think fb and goog have some ambitions in those social 智能 things, but as you said, fb guy is too young, not a bill gate's level; bill gate's math test result is actually later on a math publication; goog guys are all math guys, and they are over extended, kind of;

besides, we need break through in physics: 社会集體=强相互作用 system, a "full interaction" model, etc;

so, good for tg, many happy hours ahead

全看分页树展 · 主题 跟帖


有趣有益,互惠互利;开阔视野,博采众长。
虚拟的网络,真实的人。天南地北客,相逢皆朋友

Copyright © cchere 西西河