主题:Chinese New Year(Paul Krugm) -- 土拨鼠yuanap
共:💬33 🌺165
实在是笑死人。摘录一两段,和大家分享:
The US has failed to confront China on its economic policies for at least a decade and a half and we've paid for it during the last eight years or so. The way to get more employment here in the US is to force the Chinese government to loosen their strangle hold on their currency. Are they likely to do that without serious pressure? No! Does the US and the Europeans have the fortitude to force a change? Unfortunately, I don't think so.
草译:
过去15年里,美国政府在经济政策上败给中国了,我们为此在过去8年里付出代价。提高美国就业率的办法是强迫中国改变他们的货币政策。这个会在没有确切压力的情况下发生吗?不会。美国和欧洲有勇气干嘛?很不幸,我看不会。
Get over it. China effectively uses the dollar as it's currency. It's as simple as that. The USA can't play any exchange rate games. Can't devalue the dollar can you Ben? You're screwed and you know it guys.
草译:
嘿,哥儿们,别扯了。中国有效的利用美元作为他们的货币。就是如此简单。(因此)美国不能再玩任何汇率游戏,不能在搞贬值了。你演砸了,你知道的。
----------------------------------
从读者回复来看,克鲁格曼在读者中间就是个小丑。几乎没有什么肯定他的。他的观点漏洞百出,无法是一个有正常逻辑的人信服。美国的经济政策到了这个地步,也实在令人惋惜。
本帖一共被 1 帖 引用 (帖内工具实现)
- 相关回复 上下关系8
🙂只许州官放火,不许百姓点灯 金台夕照 字0 2010-01-08 21:53:45
🙂他的文章讨论医改的居多 白杨 字154 2010-01-05 19:53:04
🙂强烈建议把这篇文章编入一年级经济学教材 1 sukan 字66 2010-01-05 13:38:55
🙂看着读者回复,觉得克鲁格曼已经臭遍街了。
🙂也不尽然 while 字158 2010-01-04 06:35:56
🙂他这篇文章里有很多“洗脑”的成分 — 5 愚弟 字372 2010-01-03 11:10:21
🙂哈哈,这个支持 1 土拨鼠yuanap 字152 2010-01-04 06:01:02
🙂他说把汇率和购买力混为一谈了 5 晨枫 字288 2010-01-03 10:58:23