西西河

主题:冰岛总理辞职,不能保证媒体对巴拿马文件的披露是所有真实。 -- 唵啊吽

共:💬8 🌺113 新:
全看树展主题 · 分页
家园 冰岛总理辞职,不能保证媒体对巴拿马文件的披露是所有真实。

法庭宣誓:The Truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.

冰岛总理辞职即便证明巴拿马文件是The truth, 但未必是whole truth, 也不是nothing but the truth.

至今媒体报道,都不能用作法庭证据,都只是hearsay。

证据监护链第一环就断了,第一泄密人已经隐姓埋名了。如今谁控制披露渠道,都可以夹杂莫须有故事进去而死无对证。

至今媒体报道和网上传谣,之说有名字,有名字不等于就有财产,有财产不等于就都是赃款。如果必然是赃款 Mossack Fonseca公司就是销赃罪犯。

名字在巴拿马文件中出现,就有可能转移财产到海外避税,但只是可能,毕竟Mossack Fonseca是合法业务,合法业务可以用于犯罪也可以用于不犯罪。如果Mossack Fonseca业务全部是犯罪业务,那么媒体对Mossack Fonseca本身的关注度显然太低,同业对如此巨大的客户资料泄密也没有关注,这在商界是很奇芭的事情。

Mossack Fonseca公司客户性息被泄露,美国长期以来高调谴责窃取公司机密的言论竟然没有冒一个炮。美国长期高调保护客户隐私的言论也哑音。40年所有资料,肯定不仅仅是全球政界人物才是Mossack Fonseca的客户,也不能都是罪犯才成为Mossack Fonseca的客户,如果泄密者保护了其它客户的隐私,只泄密出政界人物和明星客户,那么,他也可以只泄露地缘政治敌国的名字而不泄露美国高官的名字。披露环境如此多,整个披露链都在美国掌控之内,不是地域政治武器也变成了地域政治武器。

媒体披露巴拿马文件已经越来越显示出bias,有明显地缘政治针对性,无论巴拿马文件是真是假,现在都已经是名副其实的舆论攻击,已经是名副其实的地缘政治武器。

关键词(Tags): #巴拿马文件#地缘政治#舆论战#颜色革命通宝推:高中三年,秦波仁者,红茶冰,蓝鸟,脊梁硬,红军迷,
家园 的确太明显了

同意老兄的分析。有意思的是看美国与之为敌国家的领导人(习近平、普京)的敌人是多么如获至宝。

顺便提醒一下,这个法庭誓词应该是用名词:the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth

家园 谢。改了。
家园 “巴拿马档案”女克中枪全国装无视

英媒爆料,女克团队要员与“巴拿马档案”扯上关系,美国主流媒体装失明装失聪,奇怪的是,女克的竞选对手也装失明装失聪。

桑德斯一直用“巴拿马档案”在政策层面上攻击女克,批评她推动“巴拿马自由贸易”,助长了贪污金融犯罪诸如此类,现在女克被直接牵连,这么及时的重弹药,桑德斯反而不提了,两天了,而且他们在纽约州抢票迫在眉睫。

神马自由选举,都是演戏,后面有总导演把关。即使桑德斯过两天用这个丑闻向女克开炮,也只能说明,经过研究,导演组批准可以加戏而已。

通宝推:empire2007,盲人摸象,唵啊吽,蓝鸟,
家园 本来就是驱赶各路资金回师勤王。既然美联储加不了息,

就只能挥舞大棒了。

这样英国冰岛中枪就顺理成章,中俄倒是躺枪(不过这俩家早习惯了,也不在乎)。

另外纯猜测,日韩也不是这次泄密的重灾区。

通宝推:唵啊吽,
家园 据CNBC报道,迹象显示这次是CIA的杰作

CNBC采访了揭露过瑞士银行的Bradley Birkenfeld:

Bradley Birkenfeld is the most significant financial whistleblower of all time, so you might think he’d be cheering on the disclosures in the new Panama Papers leaks. But today, Birkenfeld is raising questions about the source of the information that is shaking political regimes around the world.

Birkenfeld, an American citizen, was a banker working at UBS in Switzerland when he approached the U.S. government with information on massive amounts of tax evasion by Americans with secret accounts in Switzerland. By the end of his whistleblowing career, Birkenfeld had served more than two years in a U.S. federal prison, been awarded $104 million by the IRS for his information and shattered the foundations of more than a century of Swiss banking secrecy.

In an exclusive interview Tuesday from Munich, Birkenfeld said he doesn’t think the source of the 11 million documents stolen from a Panamanian law firm should automatically be considered a whistleblower like himself. Instead, he said, the hacking of the Panama City-based firm, called Mossack Fonseca, could have been done by a U.S. intelligence agency.

“The CIA I’m sure is behind this, in my opinion,” Birkenfeld said.

Birkenfeld pointed to the fact that the political uproar created by the disclosures have mainly impacted countries with tense relationships with the United States. “The very fact that we see all these names surface that are the direct quote-unquote enemies of the United States, Russia, China, Pakistan, Argentina and we don’t see one U.S. name. Why is that?” Birkenfeld said. “Quite frankly, my feeling is that this is certainly an intelligence agency operation.”

Asked why the U.S. would leak information that has also been damaging to U.K. Prime Minister David Cameron, a major American ally, Birkenfeld said the British leader was likely collateral damage in a larger intelligence operation.

“If you’ve got NSA and CIA spying on foreign governments they can certainly get into a law firm like this,” Birkenfeld said. “But they selectively bring the information to the public domain that doesn’t hurt the U.S. in any shape or form. That’s wrong. And there’s something seriously sinister here behind this.”

外链出处

通宝推:唵啊吽,
家园 楼主的逻辑挺奇怪的

冰岛总理辞职,显然是增加了巴拿马文件的可信度,反过来要求必须“whole truth”而且“nothing but the truth.”的东西,呵呵,比上法庭还严谨,真是求全责备啊。

至于是CIA泄露云云,真实性上抹不黑,就只能从帝国主义亡我之心不死的思路上走了么,就算是CIA放的,难道这些事就不该说了?

如果这次的文件里没有刁大大相关的东西,是否你还会这么高标准严要求?

家园 楼主的逻辑无问题。你的逻辑值得推敲

楼主说冰岛总理辞职可能证明巴拿马文件是真的,但并不能证明全部都是真的。楼主并没有要求文件全部都是真的,而是怀疑它真中掺假,不是the whole truth。你却引伸出楼主要求文件全部为真。这是什么逻辑?

你说:“就算是CIA放的,难道这些事就不该说了?”这又是扭曲的逻辑,因为楼主质疑披露文件者的动机,并未反对揭露腐败。

你说:“如果这次的文件里没有习大大相关的东西,是否你还会这么高标准严要求?”意思是责怪楼主不该这么较真。我觉得,正是因为里面涉及习近平和普京,而未提及众所周知的避税大户美国,才更值得我们高标准严要求!因为兹事体大(原因无需多言),必须严肃认真对待。假设其中只提美国人,我们反倒不必认真到同等程度。美国国内早急了,一定会认真看看是否属实、有啥背后动机了。

通宝推:唵啊吽,
全看树展主题 · 分页


有趣有益,互惠互利;开阔视野,博采众长。
虚拟的网络,真实的人。天南地北客,相逢皆朋友

Copyright © cchere 西西河