西西河

主题:这种仇视华人的言论绝对是对小孩洗脑的结果 -- 唵啊吽

共:💬266 🌺1147 🌵30
全看树展主题 · 分页首页 上页
/ 18
下页 末页
家园 这基本是小孩儿背台词吧

脱口秀节目啊。。。

家园 对。是预先排练好的。这更加恐怖

就是这个小孩已经重复多次“杀光中国人”的台词,把台词印到脑子里。这就是洗脑。

一下是一个美国人的评论:

As parents and teachers, we do our best to nurture our children. We teach them good values, guide them in the right directions when they make mistakes; we protect them from all harms before they are mature enough to protect themselves. To shield young children from inappropriate contents on TV, many parents have used the parental control features on their remote control. Initially, I thought ABC is a family friendly TV channel whose contents do not need to be monitored, but the Jimmy Kimmel's "Kid's round table" show on Oct 16 proved me wrong.

In response to the question on how to pay back our debts to other nations, a 6 year old boy proposed the idea of "Killing everyone in China". Mr. Kimmel chuckled at the answer and made the comment that this was an "interesting idea". After leading the young guests to a debate on the feasibility of using mass murder as a problem solving strategy, Mr. Kimmel further asked the kids in the show "Should we allow the Chinese to live?”, to which he got mixed answers.

I had briefly wondered how this little boy came up with the idea of “killing everyone” in a nation. Then I realized that the “Jimmy Kimmel Live” is not even a live show. Like all talk shows, there are hundreds of people working behind-the-scenes. Each writer is responsible for writing monologue jokes and each usually has an assignment for a specific guest. The shows are recorded earlier in the day to allow enough time for necessary editing.

Now I know that the 6 year old may not understand what he was saying, but the adults behind the show must know what they were doing. Instead of asking “Should we allow someone to live?”, which should not even be a question to begin with, maybe we can ask the following questions instead: Should we allow adults to channel messages of mass murder and genocide through a 6 year old? Should we allow our children to consider, even for a second, killing people as a way to solve or escape from their problems? Should we allow a TV host to expose thousands of innocent young viewers to messages of violence and hatred? Should we allow a TV program to use race baiting to boost a show’s popularity? Should we allow our children to suffer from all the negative publicity, to be laughed at, to be emotionally traumatized, so that some adults can enjoy cheap and distasteful jokes?

Enough is enough! It is time to protect our children from malicious programs on TV. It is time to say no to the adults who attempted to mislead and use innocent kids for their own agenda. Every day we shower our children with love. How can we tolerate the people who purposefully delivered hate speech that have potentially counteracted all our efforts? Until ABC issues a formal protocol to make sure something in that vein never gets aired again, until the company lets go of all the people who lacks basic judgment and human decency, we are not viewing your program again. We are not creating revenues for Disney and ABC, until you prove with your actions, that you really endorse the values your adorable cartoon characters represent.

通宝推:兰之子,
家园 这节目无疑是愚蠢和可恶的

但我觉得还是什么洗脑的还是高看JK了。什么时候搞笑脱口秀能真讨论严肃政治问题了。。。

家园 哈哈~

作为官方,我们既不能提出抗议,那样显得我们对他们的娱乐节目过于认真了;我们也不能号召普通民众请愿,那样显得我们对于他们的政府过于认真了。

哈哈~所以我们只能装作没看见~~

——关键在于——然后暗中支持民众进行各种形式的抗议~~~~

家园 赞成,不同的人有不同的位置,

只能干自己的位置上合理的事。所以如果美国华人要抗议,其内容也应该和在美华侨不同,各有其不同的理由,严格的说,如果是请愿,就是把美国政府当自己的政府了,非在美华人宜为,当然我不清楚在英语里是什么语境。至于在中国的华人,要反对也不可能是对美国政府请愿,只能是到大使馆抗议,但抗议确实有点小题大做了,如果到那个电视台,又有点太远了。其实广而告之,让我们大家都知道美国人是怎么教育他们的孩子就够了。不能对他们的守信存有幻想,不能对他们的流氓行为存有幻想,不能对他们的无底线存有幻想。

家园 嗯,类似“外交对等”

一个层面上的事情原则上在同一层面解决,“升级冲突”要看是否有必要。

家园 回得真够快的,我又加了点
家园 嗯,对。这件事的目的是要让普通中国民众认清美帝的真面目

央视最近几天一直在滚动报道事件进展~

家园 这句好:lacks basic judgment and

不过这真是美国人吗?

我十分怀疑美国人真的交给他们的孩子love,除了爱他们自己。

家园 如果你认为这个是道歉只能说你英文不好,或者听不懂英语。
家园 差1万票了,麻烦大家再努力宣传一下!!!

而且移民问题也是华人应该关心的问题了!!!

华裔也只是兢兢业业的华人和安分守己的华人入籍以后变成的吧?

为什么没有华裔有勇气站出来为华人说句公道话!!!

各位中国人请为与自己相关的利益尽点力吧!!!!

家园 这时就不讲“有容也大”了,变成睚眦必报了?

还是炸领馆那阵子那套”sorry“与”apology“的英译中区别么,有没有十年了? 孔乙己们的英文水平应该是有提高了,只是民不怕洋人,怕洋人的是官,这一条恐怕就没那么容易改喽。

家园 看来你不是语言上有问题,是逻辑思维上有问题。

他的道歉是对不起不应该把你打疼了。而不是对不起不应该打你。

家园 你读出来的意思还真多

被打脸的“everyone in china”都半个字没吐,他是对着中国国旗道歉呢,还是对他老板道歉呢,你连这都没弄清。

话说这ABC门口游行队伍里有没有人打着中国国旗,倒是没有注意,那才是大是大非。

家园 那是你们在国内有军队保护,而在国外的华人可没有军队保护。

暴乱的时候,甚至连警察的保护都没有。

最根本的是不在国外是感受不到歧视的。

这次这事是长时间积累下来的歧视爆发而已。

全看树展主题 · 分页首页 上页
/ 18
下页 末页


有趣有益,互惠互利;开阔视野,博采众长。
虚拟的网络,真实的人。天南地北客,相逢皆朋友

Copyright © cchere 西西河