主题：【转载】十八大报告全文 -- 真理
他写的都是自己在做什么，而不是高高在上教别人该怎么活
到此为止!
如果。。。很明显。。。然后就是结论。
文科生的数学就一定比理科生差么？
你这样去分析问题，最后都会砸自己的脚！很难想象如果你在现实工作中这样去做工作的话，会是什么结果。奉劝一句，从长远考虑，先改掉这些吧！
我最喜欢看人自扇耳光了，哈哈！
我出道题给你做：
证明： 设函数f(x)在M（x0,ξ）中有定义，若x0是f(x)的极值点，且f'(x0)存在，则f'(x0)=0.
“厚此薄彼是自折臂膀”这种不严谨的把大道理直接变成具体的工作准则是极其有害的。
没干过可以摸索着干，不能一开始就下大本钱。有什么样的国力就干什么事。
只配得到不严谨回答 。 恐怕不是严谨的问题，是你自己喜欢去讨论一些超出自己知识和分析能力范围的事。
而且这种与人交谈时用到的词最好改改:“问题是你有吗,你听不听的懂,不识数,你知道什么是指数函数吗”等等，与人交往要懂礼貌，小学一年级老师就应该教你了吧！
把前面出过的题再给你：
证明： 设函数f(x)在M（x0,ξ）中有定义，若x0是f(x)的极值点，且f'(x0)存在，则f'(x0)=0.
Europe.
IMF is the backyard of European financial elites. They read the numbers and they know the headache down the road.
PIIGs want EU restructuring with more free wellfare transfer from rich nations, BUT WITHOUT loss of national sovereignty--so that the PIIGs political elites can stil enjoy free lunch and political persk. Rich nations want more voting power and super-national control over EU institutions, rather than just play the role of stupid sweet daddy. Both sides are playing a dangerous game with funny implications. At certain point, capital control will be needed.
IMF rule changes have nothing to do with developing nations: they are NOW net contributors and their balance of payments and banking system health are both in their best position in 20 years.
All the IMF rule changes are prepared for Europe and (probably) America, so-called advanced nations. Actually 70% of IMF resources have been spent and wasted on Eastern Europe and PIIG Europeans already. Sorry to call them PIIGs, maybe I should take out Ireland which shows more stamina and manhood in biting the bullet of austerity.
All the remaining wellfare-eater nations, I have to call them just PIGs nations.