主题:六扇门那些事儿第三部 53 兼职。 -- 史老柒
方舟:两船相并。
《庄子·山木》:“方舟而济於河,有虚船来触舟,虽有惼心之人,不怒。” 成玄英 疏:“两舟相并曰方舟。”
汉 班固 《西都赋》:“方舟并骛,俛仰极乐。”
《梁书·武帝纪上》:“ 郧城 、 竟陵 间粟,方舟而下; 江陵 、 湘中 之兵,连旗继至。”
唐 陈希烈 《奉和圣制三月三日》:“锦缆方舟渡,琼筵太乐张。”
宋 孔平仲 《续世说·汰侈》:“ 江 南风俗,春中有竞渡之戏,方舟并进,以急趍疾进者为胜。”
清 方文 《留别宋子建徐暗公》诗:“春雨方舟海上来,箫声长近 凤凰台 。”
方舟子的笔名来历外链出处(《心中有道义,脑中有科学》)
方在中国打假, 客观上对中国是帮助,这点非常赞同和激赏。但与此同时, 方反中医和挺转基因,让人觉得他的屁股好像不那么正。 毕竟,你自己不清楚的和揽不过来就不要掺和才是正道, 放着正道不走, 所为为何?
下面是我的几个疑问:
1. 方在美国的生活来源。他在美国从1995年博士毕业后好像一直没有稳定的职业;1994年他就创办《新语丝》, 而这些都是要钱和时间的, 方既不是有闲, 又没有钱,这么搞这么多东西?要是他就是喜欢和人分享自己的思想,做一个弄潮儿, DOT COM泡沫的时候他绝对应该趁势而起, 而不是在裹足不前, 痛失良机。
2. 专利问题。方的两个专利1998年申请,2001年8~9月间批准, 在此之前方靠什么为生?即使批准后,4个发明人,方敬陪末座, 能分多少? 这个专利如果真的非常重要,以方的学历, 重大发明的参与者, 在美国找到一个像样的教职或企业研发的好位置应该不难,难不成方在1998年就决定了把自己的一生献给多灾多难的中国, 以打假为生?
3. 在你的引文中玉米的消费量最高峰是1996年,而不是2009年。 事实上从1996年到2009年, 如你所言的基因持续改善,但销量却下滑了, 为什么?
4. 玉米的美国产量一直接近3亿吨每年,按照美国农业部的说法, 是每人消费25.5磅, 约合11kg, 因为其中包括了鲜玉米, 折合干玉米大概8kg,美国全年消费玉米大概在24亿公斤,0.024亿吨, 不到美国年产的1%。 我想知道的是, 他们吃的是什么玉米?美国美国现在还有14%的非转基因玉米种植, 转基因这么好, 美国政府如此支持,他们为什么不改? 是不是美国的连锁店, 罐头和鲜玉米供应商都标示“有机认证”来规避所谓转基因限制?既然转基因这么好,为什么有机认证不认可它?
5. 反方舟子的论坛:虹桥科教论坛, 散仙谷等都不是利益集团的人把持的。 相反是一些海外学人的自留田。 散仙谷的前任版主留香就是自费雇飞机拉标语反藏独的。 这些论坛的言论可能泥沙俱下, 但主流绝对是国人的良心所在,而且这些人中大多数受过严格的思维训练,目光如炬。
6。 方和肖的争端,比较复杂。说道简历夸大, 河里的诸位,找过工作的,我相信90%的人会或多或少地拔高自己,这是人之常情, 方舟子本人也是如此。 至于肖的理论, 因为和常规理论不完全吻合,有疑问很正常, 要允许试。 现在美国政府的基金赞助肖传国大规模做手术,验证他的理论。第一证明手术是利大于弊的,第二还在试验过程当中。无论如何, 把这种正常的科研和争端上升到行骗高度是不应该的。
谢谢:作者意外获得【通宝】一枚
鲜花已成功送出,消耗 铢钱 1 个,可能得宝。可通过工具取消
提示:此次送花为【有效送花赞扬,加乐善、声望、帖得花总数】。
不过要整个揭开脸皮然后在颅骨上动手脚
想脚踩两只船还不直接说。
就扫过《庄子》,印象深刻的只有盗趾的教诲
看过介绍CIA易容术大师的书,比较神奇。
难道说今上也有
Sorry can't type Chinese now.
One thing I probably know:
Corn syrup is used in many, many, many processed food products. And that is the major way for Americans to consume GM corns as direct food - if not counting the meat products coming from livestocks feeding on GM corns.
1 bushel of shelled maize (corn) at 15.5% moisture by weight: 56 lb[2] = 25.4012 kg
US exported 20% of the annual product of corn, and consumed the rest 80%.
28.6% of the 80% went to making fuel, and 58.64% of the 80% were feed to livestocks. Then the remaining 12.76% of the 80% (10% of the total 13M bushel) were processed into different forms, and were supplied to the market as direct human food.
Although you may still argue that the 10% used for direct human consumption is less than the 14% of none-GM corn produced, it is a well known and intensively discussed topic that the corn syrups used in food industry are mainly made from GM corns.
You can regard corn syrup as one magic ingredient for the food industry. The other magic ingredient is soybean protein, which, in the US, mainly comes from GM soybeans.
In the US, it is estimated that 75% of processed food (what Americans like most ) contains transgenic ingredients.
Next time when you buy any processed food, including biscuits, candies, fries, burgers, sausages, hams, drinks... basically anything that's not in the animal or plant's original form, check the ingredients for the two magic bullets.
And the 58.64%x80%=47% of the yearly product of corn that fed to livestocks will still end their journey in human stomachs.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetically_modified_food
In the US, by 2009/2010, 93% of the planted area of soybeans, 93% of cotton, 86% of corn and 95% of the sugar beet were genetically modified varieties.[11][12]. Genetically modified soybeans carried herbicide-tolerant traits only, but maize and cotton carried both herbicide tolerance and insect protection traits (the latter largely the Bacillus thuringiensis Bt insecticidal protein). In the period 2002 to 2006, there were significant increases in the area planted to Bt protected cotton and maize, and herbicide tolerant maize also increased in sown area.[29]
Of course, what Americans do is not always the best. North American food and the way many north Americans eat, are probably the two worst things you can find in the world.
But talking about China, China is a country with barely enough(?) arable land and a growing, huge population. Organic? 40 years ago, everything in China was organic, but they were just not enough.
For this following question, I think you may consult the [Iron Hand]:
还能批判得对头,那未免要求太高了。
他说,不了解方舟子,却大肆批判方;这个和他批方不了解中医却批判中医简直是绝配。
请问西西河的创建人老铁也在美国,也要投时间投钱,他为什么创办这么个东西?不但要吃苦受累还要挨骂?
方曾经做过两段博士后,不算没有稳定的职业吧。
老铁的心血绝对没有白费, 无论用金钱还是社会影响。但老铁淡泊名利, 到现在为止没有几个人真的见到过老铁。
那么同样的情况来看新语丝,他的市场价值远不如西西河。而方热衷追逐名利, 令人十分不解。