主题：【原创】六扇门那些事儿 -- 史老柒

凶器是很重要的证物啊。

跟我们的作训猛地一看差不多，实际上，好很多。

成立跨省专案组，否则，随即作案一次就收手的话，陈案居多。

因为身高不一样，所以你握持工具的位置就会不一样，工具形成的伤痕角度也会不一样。

除非本山大哥蹲在地上，仰起小脸，手握不求人根部，把郑海霞的脖子挠伤，仿造是潘长江挠伤的痕迹。

但问题是，如果是真的凶杀案，用这种姿势这种角度能够真的把人搞死的，我估计得是一派宗师级大牛，普通凶手铁定没戏啊。

而是菜鸟，能够抗住公安审讯的，都是心理素质极佳的人才，这种人才，安全非常需要，都会收进去做特情的。

不过你的态度，还是很对头的。

犯了小事，千万别扛，早招早完事，大不了拘留几天而已。

但是犯了大事，就得相机行事了。

坦白从宽新疆搬砖，抗拒从严回家过年。

并不是一点道理都没有。

上海办社保卡是要按指纹的

　　有些还是因偶然因素落网的。

公安部应该统一协调管理地方公安机关与其他部门在构造全国性指纹库上的合作和具体操作程序。

再说东突的极端分子，本来培养的可能是给老毛子准备的，或者是长远的打算。

其实polygraph翻译成测谎仪是不准确的。以前， 美国这边只是警务人员内部调查时可以用， 对普通公民， 法律禁止使用。 但今年来有些州的立法规定法院可以采用polygraph的结果作为证据。

对付测谎仪并不难，普通人可以做到，不需要是经过专业训练的人员。凶手通过测谎仪的事情国内发生过，当然Y没跑掉。

您是在美国吗？哪个州测谎仪结果可以作为证据？

Is a polygraph admissible in court?

Yes, if ruled on by the judge. The judge is least likely to use a polygraph test if it was given by an unaccredited examiner. There is a great deal of activity in the court system today regarding the use of polygraph, the laws are changing rapidly. We will keep you posted if you check back here at our Web site. This statement in available from the American Polygraph Assoc.:

Admissibility - Polygraph results (or psychophysiological detection of deception examinations) are admissible in some federal circuits and some states. More often, such evidence is admissible where the parties have agreed to their admissibility before the examination is given, under terms of a stipulation. Some jurisdictions have absolute bans on admissibility of polygraph results as evidence and even the suggestion that a polygraph examination is involved is sufficient to cause a retrial. The United States Supreme Court has yet to rule on the issue of admissibility, so the rules in federal circuits vary considerably. The Supreme Court has said, in passing, that polygraph examinations raise the issue of Fifth Amendment protection, [Schmerber v. California, 86 S. Ct. 1826 (l966).] The Supreme Court has also held that a Miranda warning before a polygraph examination is sufficient to allow admissibility of a confession that follows an examination, [Wyrick v. Fields, 103 S. Ct. 394 (1982).] In 1993, the Supreme Court removed the restrictive requirements of the 1923 Frye decision on scientific evidence and said Rule 702 requirements were sufficient, [Daubert v. Mettell Dow Pharmaceutcals, 113 S.ct. 2786.]Daubert did not involve lie detection, per se, as an issue, as Frye did, but it had a profound effect on admissibility of polygraph results as evidence, when proffered by the defendants under the principles embodied in the Federal Rules of Evidence expressed in Daubert, see [United States v. Posado (5th Cir. 1995) WL 368417.] Some circuits already have specific rules for admissibility, such as the 11th Circuit which specifies what must be done for polygraph results to be admitted over objection, or under stipulation, [United States v. Piccinonna 885 F.2d 1529 (11th Cir. 1989).] Other circuits have left the decision to the discretion of the trial judge. The rules that states and federal circuits generally follow in stipulated admissibility were established in [State v. Valdez, 371 P.2d 894 (Arizona, 1962).] The rules followed when polygraph results are admitted over objection of opposing counsel usually cite [State v. Dorsey, 539 P.2d 204 (New Mexico, 1975).] Primarily because of Daubert, as well as the impact the other cited cases have had, polygraph examination admissibility is changing in many states. Many appeals, based on the exclusion of polygraph evidence at trial are now under review by appellate courts.

这个是专门的学问。 我太太就是干这个的，非常花时间：）

早知道可以这么进国安，年青的时侯就故意犯些小错误了，比如生活作风问题。

现在老了，估计人家也不要了。呵呵