主题：【讨论】王岐山给企业盲目海外并购泼冷水 -- 乐在其中

大概葡萄大的意思是说现在在tg眼里还不到抄底的时候，花钱要细水长流，别跟暴发户似的手里捏不住俩钱，看见大伙都闹穷就忍不住想要跑外面拉动地球内需去。还是要精打细算过日子滴。

当初要不是把咱们忽悠惨了,现在也不会这么小心,上洋人的金融课,学费老贵老贵的,但是大家脑子以后能清醒点,也算亡羊补牢了

抱歉，搞错了

再仔细看看？？

Parliament rejects bid to sink Rio-Chinalco deal

March 12, 2009 - 5:34PM

http://business.theage.com.au/business/parliament-rejects-bid-to-sink-riochinalco-deal-20090312-8w9k.html

The federal parliament has voted overwhelmingly to defeat a motion aimed at sinking China's proposed $US19.5 billion ($30.2 billion) investment in global miner Rio Tinto.

The Greens party, which opposes the investment by state-owned aluminium group Chinalco, had asked the upper house Senate to call upon Treasurer Wayne Swan to deny foreign-investment approval for the deal, unless he imposed a virtually impossible condition.

The motion by Greens leader Bob Brown called for Mr Swan to obtain assurances that the Chinese government could not appoint or remove any executives of Chinalco.

Senator Brown believes Beijing could use Chinalco's influence for its own ends.

"We are marking 50 years of domination of Tibet, and there needs to be absolute assurance that the people who can put Tibet ruthlessly under subjugation are not able to determine what happens to our resources in Australia,'' Senator Brown told Reuters.

"We are talking about a police state, not a democracy, and a ruthless authoritarian government in Beijing.''

The motion was backed by only the five Greens senators and did not even spark a debate, after government and conservative opposition senators opposed the move.

Chinalco plans to pay $US12.3 billion for stakes in key iron ore, copper and aluminium assets from debt-laden Rio and $US7.2 billion for convertible notes which double its equity interest in the company to 18%.

The Foreign Investment Review Board is reviewing the Rio-Chinalco deal, but Mr Swan must make a final decision on whether the deal is in the national interest and whether the deal should be approved, vetoed or approved with conditions

阻力会比想象的大得多。

就是说，议会关口过了。。。。

post, sorry

一个正常的领导都会这样做，这样思考，这样询问。的确应该走出去，尤其像重型卡车，三一重工这种，机不可失，失不再来。只要他们准备好，一步步走，当然是好事。中国有很多优势行业该走出去，至少不能死守一亩三分地，这样只有死路一条。不进步，不发展，便寻死。

三一重工的总裁秘书最该受到批评，怎么能准备这样毫无深度，内涵的讲稿给老大呢？他脑子怎么想的，是不是酒喝多了。我要是老大，回去先把这个人换掉，把手下一群嚷嚷着走出去的经理们骂个半死。然后让他们一周之内搞出来个有头有脸的计划书。。。当然，我也不傻，逼他们这么急整不出什么好东西，也是找借口修理他们罢了。最终还是要他们拿出来个可以用的。