主题：油价是真的不可救药了 -- mandman
Are pretty impressive, and pretty too.
If the company can manage to boost the specs to 500miles per charge, it would be practical for the use of daily commute also.
长期看不会降价的。
化石能源是最廉价的能源，不会有其他能源比化石能源更廉价。
能源价格保持低位，受损失的是其它能源，受益的是化石能源。
化石能源的比例会慢慢降低的，但是代价是能源价格高涨。
el
目前有技术可以达到百公里三升油耗，还没有商业化就是了。
混合动力车比燃油车油耗低，超过MPG100应该几年内就可以看到。
偷电的担心似乎过滤了。电动汽车充电需要的电流量太大，不是什么地方都能够提供的。偷电不这么容易。
their cars can reach a 256mpg equivalent. Then a 220miles per charge and a 3.5hrs recharge could be a problem (with a top speed of 125mph, that means you have to recharge every 2 hours of driving or even less). and of course there is the intimidating price tag and a fairly long waiting list going on.
nevertheless tesla beats prius out of the water for sure.
for oil gets lower the price of oil will fail, assuming the supply of oil is available.
油的产量已经接近峰顶了。需求增长却没有任何减慢的趋势。除非中国经济出问题。
要不是因为油的产量接近峰顶了，哪会有这么多其它动力汽车的研究呢？
does not mean the supply dries out.
My posts are discussing the possibilities of replacing fossil fuel with electricity, which may be generated by nuclear plants. Although it may cost a arm and a leg to build the plants, it will provide an alternative to the fossil fuel and may low pollution if carefully maintained.
核电站的投资成本摆在那里呢，投资成本很高，要指望核电来降低电价，是不大可能的。
非传统能源的比例越来越高的真正原因就是因为廉价的化石能源逐渐枯竭，能源价格上涨，非传统能源才有经济性。
不是因为非传统能源发展而导致化石能源需求减少，而是因为廉价化石能源供不应求才导致非传统能源有经济性。非传统能源里面包括开采成本很高的化石能源，比如油砂，深海油井等。
你把因果关系搞反了。
非传统能源的作用，是减缓了化石能源的涨价速度，但是起不到降价的作用。
building nuclear plants.
The materials for generating nuclear power are abundant. The cost of operating nuclear power plants is low, comparing to coal power plants.
At the price of $120, oil is not a cheap energy source anymore.
120的价格仍然是虚高，是短期市场行为的结果。
但是回到60-70是不可能了。
我的帖子说的是85。油价基本上不会低于85。
3 dollars?
oilfield. 这年头增加reserve就是王道, 杠杆作用太明显了. 将来倒手的时候能卖个更好的价钱.