主题:【紧急求助】给本校校报写了封抗议信 -- aqu
今天中午已经将抗议信(姓名和电话)发出到校报主编,因为原文里有instigate的内容所以也cc给校长信箱。同时加了些图片,去掉主编名,打印一份,贴在平时分发校报地方的墙上了。谢谢大家支持,特别感谢Evilpanda帮我细致修改。
一起加油!
本校不大,却也河蟹不缺,今日本校校报写了篇题为加
州成功挺独运动,通篇胡扯。实在看不下去,赶写一篇
驳斥文章。回避藏独政争,集中三点
1。该文bias报道:通篇没有一句话描述supporter.可
是torchbearer却包括上至SF前市长,下到high school
学生....80人中只有一个偷偷挺藏。
2。揭露该文fake奥委会主席rogge言论,rogge只说奥
运会帮助推进中国包括人权在内的进程,rogge还说西藏
是中国主权范围,奥委会不会越线
3。批评该文煽动学生envolve in political
movement.加了很多2006年法国学生骚乱的事儿,因为本
人当时在彼,所以现身说法,警告最后会导致学生警察
skirmish,上街烧汽车 (实际上看看新闻,今天法国学生
和警察居然又skirmish了,顺便我也恶心了法国,嘿嘿)
所有论据我都加了引用链接,基本上都是CNN和ESPN报
道,还有wiki,可是,本人毕竟工科出身,用词不知深
浅,比如这个煽动,instigate还是agitate,哪一个更
能让人厌恶?
我的策略,先发校报主编,不理再发校长和学校
judicial affairs office,因为用fake信息煽动学生
也是违反学校code的。
附上本文:
A biased report with false information on UDReview
I am truly shocked by a report on UDReview as well as her website under the topic "Calif. protests successful in pro-Tibet movements" by Mr. Haley Marks issued on 04/15/08. This biased report violated the basic principles journalist integrity. It also instigates political movement with false statement.
First of all, in the total 904 words of this report, there is not a single word regarding the other side - the supporters of the torch relay. In fact, the supporters overwhelmed the protestors by number.They included not only the Chinese in America but also from all groups of American. The people in SF showed their hospitality to the guests and the torch. Including the former mayor of San Fransico Mr. Willie Brown Jr., 80 people ran and carried the Olympic torch through San Francisco on April 9. They are scholars, former Olympic gold medalists, the retired, and high school students. Only one showed her support stealthily in her sleeve. Almost all of the rest of the people felt this experience as their "exciting lifetime opportunity" according to the live report of NBC. However, none of them were reviewed in this report. What happened to the fairness principle in Journalism?
The name list of the torchbearer from San Francisco Chronicle
http://www.sfgate.com/cgibin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2008/04/04/runnerlist.DTL
Secondly, this report falsified the so-called "denouncement" from Mr. Jacques Rogge, the head of the IOC. Let's read what Mr. Rogge said through CNN, "awarding the games to China would advance the social agenda of China including human rights." in his "rare mention of human rights in China".
CNN news on April, 10
http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/asiapcf/04/10/torch.relay/index.html
The report from ESPN on April 11 reported that IOC won't press for China-tibet talks, "As to entering into these issues, this is the line that we do not have to cross", "This is a sovereign matter for China to decide."
ESPN news “Rogge: IOC won’t press for China-tibet talks” on April, 11
http://sports.espn.go.com/oly/news/story?id=3341444
Actually, Mr. Rogge showed his sadness to those "protesters": "We were saddened by what we saw in London and Paris, we were sad for the atheletes and torch bearers. We were sad for the children who watched their heroes and role models bing booed." on April 09.
CNN news “Olympic chief saddened by protests” on April, 10
http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/asiapcf/04/09/olympics.torch/index.html
In the ancient Greece, states stopped the war for the celebration of Olympic game, today fanatic protesters declared a war on the Olympic torch.
Finally, the author is instigating the student into a politicalized movement. Apparently, the people behind this report are not satisfied with the peaceful life in UD campus, they feel "happy" if the fanatic political protest comes to this peaceful campus.
Instigating statement on UDreview website
http://media.www.udreview.com/media/storage/paper781/news/2008/04/15/News/Calif.Protests.Successful.In.ProTibet.Movements-3324529-page3.shtml
This experience highly recalled my terrible experience of the student protest and riot in Paris in March, 2006. I was in Paris for a research in plasma physics at that time. I witnessed this incident exacerbating from classroom protest to violent clashes between student and police. Cars were burnt in the street of Paris on March 18, 2006. Sorbonne building was closed by 2-meters-high steel board, with armed vehicles stationed behind it.
The incident in 2006 in Paris on Wiki
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_labour_protests_in_France
This extreme scene was the result from the politicalized agitations by irresponsible people like the author of this report. People like him used biased reports and false statements to disturb the peace in the campus. This is unacceptable.
I am a Graduate student from China doing my microelectronics study here in UD since 2006. I love this university and I love sports. Jogging in the trail along the railway is my favorite activity. Smiling and saying "Hello" to each other while jogging, either known or not, is the simple spirit of Olympic game in my mind. I don’t deny being a Chinese, naturally I do feel honored to have the Olympic game hosted in my country. Any attack against the Olympic spirit and the torch, as the symbol of peace and friendship, is sad and condemnable, especially from the most popular newspaper in my peaceful campus.
Therefore, I strongly urge UDReview take immediate actions to this report and its author Mr. Marks. I also demand an official apology from UDReivew to the readers who had felt the hurts from Mr. Haley Marks's report, especially those who support and love the Olympic game.
阿去
本帖一共被 1 帖 引用 (帖内工具实现)
上周末本地小镇200周年纪念,各个社团都有方队参加一个有花车的游行,于是本校China club就组织了一个奥运方阵,跟在本地一个武馆后面,于是前面锣鼓震天加杂耍,后面就是我们的奥运方队。人少了点儿,可是美女多阿,虽然我还没经人家允许....顾不了这么多了,反正是扬名出彩的好事儿么
[FLASH]Car was burnt in the street of Paris on March 18, 2008[/FLASH]
用Wiki要小心,怎么跑2008了?
个人感觉只能攻击校报,不容易攻击个人。每个人都可以有不同的观点,但报纸的观点必须平衡。
不知道你这个校报是不是public media,通常的应该不是,只是campus publications.
最后一段过了些,通常报纸道歉只是承认不该发什么文章,或者把你的反驳文章原封不动登出来。至少不能说all the reader,应该是to the readers who had felt the hurts from Mr. Haley Marks's article.
用词推敲不在行,煽动只能是instigate?faked是完全无中生有那种的,incomplete or biased可能更好些。
你看得很细,我已把两处改了。
可是那个denouncement用bias和incomplete都力度不够,人家Rogge明显没有denounce而且重申主权,这个还不算fake?
不过我现在这里已经晚上2点半了,脑子木了,明儿早再看看,中午就发出去,我会把对作者本人的condemn全放到对文章的condemn里面去。
谢谢!
请看短信。
I modified them, and sent it to the editor in chief and cc to the president of my university. I may send it to the judicial affair office but not yet. Did I make too much voice by doing so?
但是cc给中国同学会应该有用。
本身就很熟的,只是考虑到duke内奸事件,先不要牵扯太多吧。省的又有人说我们的CSSA是大使馆控制的。Duke cronicle那篇文章和讨论我都看过了,很气愤,也感觉相当被动。
我要等待主编反应,还有校长办公室应该会关注吧。Duke那边的讨论有一个美国人留言说,"你们来到美国,就要接受美国的方式",所以我的思路就是美国方式,美国内容,除了我不否认我是中国人外,一律就美国这边的事儿说事儿,你看我信里也一句没提西藏。