西西河

主题:【原创】二十一世纪的洗心运动 -- 井底望天

共:💬880 🌺3045 🌵25
分页树展主题 · 全看首页 上页
/ 59
下页 末页
      • 家园 11个截屏,立此存照

        看到河友提到这个结果还不太相信,自己做了下实验,然后我囧了

        点看全图

        外链图片需谨慎,可能会被源头改

        点看全图

        外链图片需谨慎,可能会被源头改

        点看全图

        外链图片需谨慎,可能会被源头改

        点看全图

        外链图片需谨慎,可能会被源头改

        点看全图

        外链图片需谨慎,可能会被源头改

        点看全图

        外链图片需谨慎,可能会被源头改

        点看全图

        外链图片需谨慎,可能会被源头改

        点看全图

        外链图片需谨慎,可能会被源头改

        点看全图

        外链图片需谨慎,可能会被源头改

        点看全图

        外链图片需谨慎,可能会被源头改

        点看全图

        外链图片需谨慎,可能会被源头改

        11张图,除了最后两个,全部是我刚才亲手截的。

        使用的是google.de,系统mac osx 中文环境。

        • 家园 终于见识了......
        • 家园 你有没有发觉恍若上了大鸡园?

          'Nough said.

          • 家园 看到了现象,但是想不明白这个结果

            总是在食堂里看见大妓院已经很烦了,每天google还来搀和

            为啥会有这个结果

            AllenKid兄有时间的话能不能发个贴解释下里面的技术背景?

            • 家园 Well I can hazzard a guess

              Though as I stated earlier, I have absolutely no idea why certain terms get promoted or included at all.

              Basically two words come to mind - "spamming" and "trolling"

              Clearly the Google suggest is partially based on frequency of search terms. So if said terms were repeatedly sent by a distributed spam network, we can expect this particular term is guaranteed a slot in the pull-down menu unless censored. Also there is trolling, even if Google sensed there is something wrong with the suggestion, a determined troll (or in this case a determined group of trolls) will actively submit similar terms until they successfully game the system.

              Remember 4chan's porn attack on YouTube? There is no defense against blitz trolling.

              Or another example, YouTube user VenomFangX filed thousands of bogus DMCA takedown notices against vocal atheists, YouTube is legally responsible to take down everyone of them unless each uploader produce evidence of none copyright infringement.He is a typical troll and YouTube can do nothing about it. Things got resolved eventually coz one of these victims decided to sue VenomFangX and the troll chickened.

              So here it is, the results you captured is highly political and offensive, but it could be the result of 1. Google's negligence or incompetence; 2. Google's malevolence toward China and Chinese people.

              Given Falun Dafa's stellar reputation in PR, I think it's safe to say the truth is more in the first scenario's ballpark.

              • 家园 Partially Agree

                Yet, the "Chinese people eat babies" cannot be explained as 1) I doubt Falun Dafa would use the label "Chinese" here; 2) the frequency of the search has been pretty low.

                I wonder if any of us can request an official response from Google?

              • 家园 基本同意。但是flg干嘛要攻击百度呢?

                又不是只有百度才对flg的搜索结果进行审查。

                • 家园 这个还不好解释吗

                  大法们似乎一直认为那些恶毒抹黑TG的言论和一大堆疯狂的“事实”可以让中国人民认清TG的邪恶本质

                  所以在搜索建议上动手脚把人引向他们的那些“真善美”的内容是很法很轮滴一步。

                  请站在疯人的角度去理解疯人,谢谢^_^

      • 家园 还应该加上GOOGLE.CN上的截图

        在GOOGLE.CN上直接输入"CHINESE EAT",只有“CHINESE EAT BABIES"一个联想。输入"中国人 吃"联想也不少。

        PS,太具体的技术搜索技术我不懂。只是想问下这种只有一个联想的情况是不是能说明什么问题?

      • 家园 花谢!需要更多这样的截屏!
      • 家园 呃,其实……国内能看到.com

        不用翻墙。

        谢截图

      • 家园 你搜搜 British people 试试?

        或者 French people

        Google 的 search suggestion 就是个 running joke.

        不用觉得自己被针对了。

        还有下面这个:

        点看全图

        外链图片需谨慎,可能会被源头改

        第一条建议就这么大逆不道的存在着,至少快有一年了~~~

分页树展主题 · 全看首页 上页
/ 59
下页 末页


有趣有益,互惠互利;开阔视野,博采众长。
虚拟的网络,真实的人。天南地北客,相逢皆朋友

Copyright © cchere 西西河