主题：Brief on 贵州事件 discussion -- dahuahua

There are two sides:

A: 自杀派

1. 溺水=自杀,未检出精液=没有奸,

2.验尸报告支持自杀说,身上衣着无异常，无挣扎痕迹。

3.疑罪从无

4. Marfia 打着申冤的旗号围攻政府

5. Till now many info supporting the Victim's family is proved to be wrong

6. 自杀 is accepted since that girl is involving the "love" issue with her boyfriend

B. 置疑 派

1. No evidence for 自杀,

2. 验尸报告 only proves 溺水

3. The info provided by Gov is not complete

4. Not so many people are Marfia, and dare to 围攻政府

5. Since Central Gov set up the tune, so naturally there will be the routine to solve it as scheduled.

6. During all info we have, there are plenty doubts on Gov's announcement: Victim's uncle's beaten, 俯卧撑

Skills attacking 置疑 派:

1. 阴谋论

2. No matter how convincing and complete the evidences are that Gov provided, 置疑 派 will always find excuse to question. So current info provide by Gov is enough.

3. Who 置疑, who should take the responsibility to 举证

My points in this case:

I call on the common base for discussion--social conscience--which is general accepted that we should help the weakness, and who really needs help. Based on this base, and the info we collect, we can draw conclusion accordingly and discuss among each other.

In this case, I am 置疑 派, and I doubt the 政府公信力, based on my experience in Guizhou for doing research as contral gov't officer etc. in mid of 1990's.

Since LI's family is relatively weak compare to the strength of local Gov, I tend to scrutinize info Gov provided, unless the info is convincing and generally accepted by people.

My impression to some extrem自杀派: over-sensitive for the behavior of questioning Gov. --which I believe questioning Gov is the support to Gov's work, improve Gov's performance

P.S. Sorry I type with English (I was informed it is better to type Chinese) since I am in company's lab and not allowed to install software.