西西河

主题:【原创】不完美的新冠疫苗也是有作用的,必须的。 -- 吃土的蚯蚓

共:💬80 🌺341 🌵13 新:
全看分页树展 · 主题 跟帖
家园 证据也要讲质量吧?

总不能搬运一些没有说服力的所谓证据来证明什么吧?

也用不着破腹自证,你要是有能力,可以尝试一下说明:

The major study limitations included that the study was an observational study based on real-world data rather than a randomized control trial, and the quality of data could be affected by the accuracy and completeness of medical records.

能不能解释清楚,既然这样是上面这样没有对照组,数据质量也有局限,为何这么肯定有关联呢?

QPT was associated with a substantially lower risk of in-hospital mortality, without extra risk of acute liver injury or acute kidney injury among patients hospitalized with COVID-19.

连RCT都没有,我就奇怪了,这文章的作者,是如何肯定QPT,而不是其他因素有关联的呢?

全看分页树展 · 主题 跟帖


有趣有益,互惠互利;开阔视野,博采众长。
虚拟的网络,真实的人。天南地北客,相逢皆朋友

Copyright © cchere 西西河