- 程序有所改变。发帖如还有问题请报告
- 【征集】西西河的经济学,及清流措施,需要主动参与者,『稷下学宫』新认证方式,24年网站打算和努力目标
主题:【原创】“四大文明古国”不是中国概念 -- 用心荐华
共:💬52 🌺524 🌵1 新:
我记得小时历史课本是用的四大古代文明的说法,没有加上“古国”。现在应该也没变。
参见:大河流域──人类文明的摇篮_人教版九年级中国历史上册(http://zxkeben.szxuexiao.com/html/1523.html)金字塔图片左边的文字说明。
我不知道有些所谓的学者是不是自己树个靶子自己打着玩儿。
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cradle_of_civilization
The Columbia Encyclopedia, in its article titled "Civilization," says that the earliest civilizations developed in the following parts of the world: "Mesopotamia, Egypt, China, India, the central Andes, and Mesoamerica." Since the 1990s, scholarship has defined Norte Chico in the coastal area of present-day Peru as another independent site of civilization.
In the United States and Canada, the AP World History teaches that the six early civilizations as the foundation of human culture are: "Mesopotamia, Egypt, Indus, Shang (or Yellow River valley), Mesoamerica and Andean South America. These "civilizations" are also discussed in this article.
- 相关回复 上下关系8
🙂【原创】“四大文明古国”不是中国概念 206 用心荐华 字10173 2013-10-15 07:51:02
🙂陈的书一点学术味道都没有 1 hwd99 字257 2017-04-22 20:05:50
🙂文明的标准 2 用心荐华 字2082 2014-03-06 16:05:54
🙂四大文明古国是不严谨的概念,记得小时历史课本是文明摇篮
🙂呵呵,所以说挖山是个系统性工程嘛,实名的也好,匿名的也好 夜月空山 字295 2013-10-23 15:09:27
😂只要坚持唯一无断绝成熟 5 天煞穆珏 字104 2013-10-22 05:42:28
🙂纠结于几大文明,到底有多大意义呢? 10 衣笠山麓 字2128 2013-10-21 08:36:44
🙂我支持你说的不要囿于西方话语。但我觉得这个纠结还是有意义 18 唵啊吽 字573 2013-10-21 09:40:08