- 程序有所改变。发帖如还有问题请报告
- 【征集】西西河的经济学,及清流措施,需要主动参与者,『稷下学宫』新认证方式,24年网站打算和努力目标
主题:关于《纽约时报》新疆照片的一些新线索 -- 雷声
有人已经上了一个帖子,但先在找不到了,想跟跟不了,所以这里上一个新贴。
刚才在看blog的时候,有人的一个回帖提供了不少新内容,指出了《纽约时报》报道的一些瑕疵。如果是真的,那么就是非常大的瑕疵了。原文如下:
Now, let the fun begins;
According to New York Times:
“The three witnesses said they had seen the events from the Barony Hotel, which sits across the street from a compound of the People’s Armed Police, …”,… “All three dashed to the window in the photographer’s room,…”
First, the Barony Hotel (塔西南邦臣酒店) is neither located “across the street from a compound of people’s …” nor across the street from the Yiquan Hotel where the incident actually happened, even it is on the same Seman Road as Yiquan Hotel is. How these three foreign tourists and “witnesses” took the picture from their hotel window is beyond anyone’s imagination.
Second, how these three foreign tourists had convinced all the armed paramilitary policemen involved in the action to change the color of the uniform from grey to green in that particular morning is, again, beyond anyone’s imagination. (“li-si” indicated the same issue couple of comments before)
来源:外链出处
没有事件翻译,内容概括如下:
1.出事的怡金饭店是和武警总部背靠背,不是隔街。不可能隔街拍照。
2.报道称,拍照旅游者在塔西南邦臣酒店(Barony Hotel)。事实上该饭店虽然和怡金在同一条街上,但相隔甚远,不可能拍照。
作者也指出,该27张照片中的3张已经出现在AP的报道中,为何时隔那么久又全冒出来。很可能是AP在中间挑了3张,其它他们知道有问题。
作者始终将怡金的拼音写成Yiquan,并写繁体字,可能是热心的海外华人。
- 相关回复 上下关系2
🙂关于《纽约时报》新疆照片的一些新线索
🙂【更新】现在有老外说Barony的确在怡金对面 3 雷声 字1251 2008-09-30 10:32:03