主题：【原创】老文重看——钱学森的亩产论 -- sitan

钱学森帮共产党说过好几次话，就我知道的

1。大跃进时亩产论。

2。邓小平第三次被打倒时，钱说过打倒的好。

3。89之后，钱上电视说“到底是我们胜利了呢，还是坏人胜利了呢?”

直到那时，我还不真正了解钱的贡献，所以还有点鄙视其人。等到后来，有了更多的人生经验，我开始敬重钱老。客观上，论对国家的贡献，钱老是不是比我们所有人加起来还要多呢。主观上，钱老为共产党说好话，是为了他自己捞好处不成？他的历史地位已经是无可动摇，他的儿女那时都在美国发展，我想不出他说这些话有点什么私心。从钱老身上，我们搞科学技术的人可以学到一点教训，政治领域的翻云覆雨真真假假不是头脑聪明就可以参透的。钱老都会犯的错误，我们就敢说不会犯？

我们可以看看这篇文章，了解一点钱老的情怀。

http://pr.caltech.edu/periodicals/CaltechNews/articles/v36/tsien.html

。。。。。。

We weren’t able to talk much during my most recent visit, but when I saw him in 1991 and again in 1996, we had some very interesting conversations. I think in general we both felt less constrained than we had during our reunion in 1981. One comment he made to me in 1991 particularly stands out: “You know, Frank, we’ve done a lot for China. People have enough food. They’re working and progress is being made. But Frank, they’re not happy.” He felt very bad about that—almost, I think, a little bit responsible for it, although it was not an area he was involved in at all. His area of activity was military and civilian rocketry, and this was strictly a personal observation. That was about as far as he ever went in saying that things were not ideal.

。。。。。。

大致翻译：钱和他的前加州理工的同事在81，91，96会见了三次。特别的，钱在91年的有这么一个论述“我们为中国做了很多。人民有足够的粮食。他们[中国人民]正在努力，正在不断进步。但是，他们[中国人民]并不快乐”。钱老的同事评论道，钱对此[人民并不快乐]觉到很糟糕，甚至觉得个人对此要负一点责任，尽管我们都知道这一点也不是钱的专业领域。这是钱和他的加州理工同事的谈话中，在关于中国的事情还并不理想的话题上，涉及最深入的一次。

钱学森和邓稼先一样，都是中华民族的千古英雄。日月之食不掩其辉。