主题：印度的事情 -- MRandson
至于“保持接触，却在某些关键环节进行遏制”的方法么，
老牌的帝国主义者们早都用过了，
美国现在对中国也在用着，
其实美国在苏联刚垮的时候，自以为已经实现这个单极世界的目标了
有一本书叫《历史的终结》，讲的就是当时美国的想法，
Rhett兄，俺之前有言语不恭之处，请兄见谅!
鲜花已经成功送出，可通过工具取消
提示：此次送花为此次送花为【有效送花赞扬，涨乐善、声望】。
阿三的优势也在于它的对手们也在内耗，且耗得不轻。
当一个国家内部矛盾重重，执政者的统治出现危机的时候，他们就需要树立外在的敌人来转嫁危机，凝聚内部的共识。执政者的统治力越是薄弱，他们民族主义的大喇叭就吹得越是嘹亮。在这样的背景下，任何对外的议题就往往会以『生死存亡』来解读。
民族主义的大喇叭其实看似朝外，实则朝内。大喇叭要告诉屋里人们：“虽然当家的确把家照顾得不怎么样，大家日子过得紧巴巴，可是隔壁的老流氓整天居心叵测地惦记着你们，还好有我保护大家，要不然你们明天全都会被他们给强暴了。”
听到大喇叭宣传的善良民众于是群情激愤，各自掏出小喇叭响应：“千真万确，隔壁的老流氓整天居心叵测地惦记着我们，还好有当家的保护我们，要不然我们明天全都会被他们给强暴了。日子紧巴巴的问题并非生死攸关，容后再议。当务之急是咬紧牙关，紧密团结在当家的周围，共度难关。”
可是这大喇叭有个缺陷，就是声音如果太小，善良的民众可能听不见，或者听到的人不多，声音如果太大，大小喇叭一起喊，隔壁的老流氓家的也可能听见，而且听见后可能会很反感，甚至针锋相对。于是当家的不得不在对屋内善良民众大声宣传的同时，暗地里和老流氓打圆场。甚至对老流氓说，那喇叭不是我故意弄的，是一些不明真相的围观群众自己瞎折腾的。咱们两家关系总体不错，历史遗留问题不影响大局，老兄不必挂在心上。
于是我们看到了rediff.com最热闹的话题就是中国蓄谋入侵，巴基斯坦支持恐怖袭击，最令人欣慰的就是政府和军方强硬的态度，最令人振奋的话题就是印度和美国的军事合作，以及印度的民主价值和核威慑能力，最令人沮丧的就是中印经济实力差距以及巴、孟、尼、斯、缅成了中国的走狗，毛派印奸内外勾结，政党贪污懦弱。最令人愤怒的话题就是政府说中印边境是最和平的边境，中国入侵传闻虚构不实...
we need a total foreign policy change. In Nepal, we aided a dictator for so long, while China helped to bring in power a group that most people wanted over the dictator. India 0 China 1
In Pakistan, no matter what we say, China is building roads. India 0 China 2.
In Myanmar, we might have gotten some concession from the military junta to build roads, etc but ultimately, we are helping the dictators there while the people suffer. This is not india's way. This is what india has become. Helping oppression. India 0 - China 3.
Sri Lanka, we gave weapons to Sri Lanka knowing that they will kill their minorities using the weapons. What makes it worse is that these are our hindu brothers that got killed. I searched on the net and found that the head of IPKF has even complained that india has aided in genocide. Now Sri Lanka is still pro-Chinese and our only ally in the region, the tamils hate us. India 0 China 4.
Maldives. This might be the only correct foreign policy where Maldives has been pro-India. India 1 - China 4.
Bangladesh, do we even need to speak about Bangladesh. With its new spanking China friendship bridge and much aid, we know where their allegiance lie. India 1 China 5.
There is one more country where we have failed but not in foreign policy but in home affairs. The maoist within india have much support because we failed to have equitable development. Even in our own country China has beaten us. India 1 China 6.
Does anyone think we need a foreign policy change
忧心忡忡的印度人支持你来了
怎么能说缺乏实际内容呢
印度也是内忧外患深重。多谢资料。
邓小平敢放下一切搞经济发展是很强的，当时周边是号称美帝包围圈加苏俄包围圈，还好内部稳定的。
印度形势比我们好多了，经济建设还靠天吃饭，还要花大钱买武器，可能还是要解决巴基斯坦问题牵扯太多，没想到这个西夏就是顽抗不停给印度放血。还有镇压内部的离心势力。
印度要合力还是很难，功力不够，七伤拳先伤了自个先
罗汉兄还出国大战，兄弟佩服
狼兄描述的很好，许多事在我为小，在印为大，劫材轻重缓急不同，我们可以笑看风云，印度网民只好一惊一乍，享受过山车了
还是我所说的，这是上层之间的政治。当年受益的那一代会记得你，直接参与项目的官员会记得你，可惜这批人没剩下几个了。
医疗队的情况好一些，不少医生留在坦桑尼亚行医了。
坦桑尼亚是中国在非洲的根基最稳固的一个，但是反华的事情也是有的，去年胡锦涛访问的时候就有反华游行。对于新一代的普通人，中国只是廉价消费品的来源地，也是破坏当地一些传统行业，特别是成衣业的黑手。中国目前的援建项目，集中在大工程方面，特别喜欢盖政府办公楼，对于老百姓改善对中国的印象没什么好处。
在坦桑尼亚民间的普遍印象的确是和中国关系不错，但是普通人接触不到中国，没有具体概念，因此就缺乏扎实基础。一旦个人在进一步接触中因为各种原因产生不满，容易发展成为反面情绪。
目前在坦桑尼亚，喜欢西方的人远远多于喜欢中国的人。作为中国曾经花了很大力气培养的地方，相关决策者应该反思了。
另外，坦赞铁路的最大受益者是赞比亚。赞比亚的表现可真不怎么样，反华势力很严重的。
克林顿刚给印度一个超越中国的锦囊：就是维持军费在GDP20%以内，和巴基斯坦睦邻友好，协助稳定阿富汗局势。以印度的资质，完全可以超越中国，让21世纪成为印度而非中国的世纪。
老克虽然是诓着印度给自己的阿富汗战略解套，但是也看得出印度的问题核心。就是要控制军费和睦邻友好，全力发展经济。老克难道不是在向印度兜售本朝太宗改革的国策？
可藏南问题解决不了，面对中国国防现代化和国内民族主义的内外压迫，印度政府又怎么能不和中国军备竞赛呢？如果印度和中国边境问题持续纠缠，中国又怎么会不援助巴基斯坦呢？如果巴基斯坦有足够能力，他又怎么不会利用宗教势力暗地里支持针对印度的恐怖组织呢？
相比之下，印度能怎么样呢？印度收留达赖有什么用呢？TG正盼着老和尚归西，自己山寨一个十五世。虽然行为比较猥琐，动机非常恶毒，但是毕竟不会对国家稳定造成太大的冲击。印度可以支持东突吗？他自己国内伊斯兰教恐怖主义比中国更严重。可以支持台独吗？恐怕和台独交集不多。
看着TG时不时通过藏南问题上提醒印度人民向国外购买先进武器要舍得花钱，有时候觉得TG真的很邪恶。
资料来源？要翻墙吗？
罗汉兄真是强：太宗的国策。这归纳的真好。
Washington, Oct 13 (IANS) Former US president Bill Clinton has said India has the potential to outgrow China if it makes peace with Pakistan.
This peace between the two countries could lead to a more modern Afghanistan and contribute to a worldwide drawdown of nuclear weapons, he said speaking at the Indian Institute of Technology’s Global Conference 2009 in Chicago Saturday.
In turn this could even indirectly influence a reduction of conflict in the Middle East, Clinton said when asked how India could play a more significant role in the UN and G20 in the future.
‘If you [India] did not have to raise defence spending 20 percent a year and these countries could be working together I think you will grow faster than China,’ he said adding, ‘I think this idea that the Chinese are going to dominate the 21st century is not necessarily true.
‘It depends mostly what you do and if you can continue to pour money into the development of the people and reduce inequalities in India…not the standoffs along the 1971 line or the fights over Kashmir or what ever,’ said Clinton.
‘It’s easier to say than to do, I know that especially after what happened in Mumbai, where I watched the hotel room I always stay in burning, I know that,’ he said referring to the stalling of India-Pakistan peace talks after the 26/11 terrorist attacks.
But ‘I’m just telling you if Indian-Americans and Pakistani Americans could find ways to work together it would make a big difference’.
‘The same thing is true in Afghanistan. I see this all the time. Every time India does something in Afghanistan, Pakistan thinks it is directed against it and vice versa,’ Clinton said.
‘But the truth is if the two countries could find a way to work together and do common projects there, it would do more to stabilize Afghanistan and bring it into a 21st century mindset…,’ he said.
‘If that one thing could be done on the Indian subcontinent it would revolutionise the century in ways no one can imagine. It would help to reduce the nuclear threat the world faces,’ Clinton said adding, ‘It would help reduce the rush all these other countries are making to get nuclear weapons.
‘It would indirectly play a major role in encouraging a reduction of tensions in the Middle East. And I think India and Pakistan together would outgrow China in the 21st century.’
村长说的是实情，我曾经在非洲工作两年多，各个阶层的人都有接触。说到底，非洲不是中国的外交重点，此外，中国人和非洲人相互都缺乏起码的尊重和理解。我第一次发帖，希望以后能和村长多交流。