主题：【整理】新冠中医成就整理 -- 阴霾信仰
共:💬206 🌺952 🌵35
复 那是研究背景
那就请解释一下：
The major study limitations included that the study was an observational study based on real-world data rather than a randomized control trial, and the quality of data could be affected by the accuracy and completeness of medical records.
能不能解释清楚，既然这样是上面这样，为何这么肯定有关联呢？
QPT was associated with a substantially lower risk of in-hospital mortality, without extra risk of acute liver injury or acute kidney injury among patients hospitalized with COVID-19.
连RCT都没有，我就奇怪了，这文章的作者，是如何肯定QPT，而不是其他因素有关联的呢？
- 相关回复 上下关系8
压缩 3 层
🙂我明白你这胡搅蛮缠的水平了，送囧拉黑不送 1 阴霾信仰 字205 2021-09-24 02:26:30
🙂待认可未通过。偏要看
🙂那是研究背景 2 思想的行者 字170 2021-09-22 07:44:45
🙂好吧
🙂好啊，那你来介绍一下瑞德西韦的RCT情况吧 1 qq97 字51 2021-09-24 01:54:36
🙂当然不会双标了 懒厨 字69 2021-09-24 01:59:28
🙂谁说瑞德西韦的RCT结果不行？那FDA为什么又批准了呢？ 3 qq97 字245 2021-09-24 03:54:15
🙂待认可未通过。偏要看