主题：加拿大前外交官在北京被抓了，当然应该是独立事件 -- 一着

看看美国的PROVISIONAL ARREST REQUEST FOR WANZHOU MENG《孟晚舟临时逮捕请求书》

Because Meng and other Huawei representatives misrepresented to Financial Institution I (Note:i.e. HSBC) and other financial institutions about Huawei‘s relationship (Note:not specified but maybe China big 4 banks?) about Huawei’s relationship with Skycom, these victim banking (Note:potential victims) institutions were induced into carrying out transactions that they otherwise woud not have completed. (Note: these banks are supposed to rely only on their own decision to provide service or not based on their DD.) As a result, they violates the banks's internal policies, potentially violates U.S. sanctions laws and exposed the banks to the risk of fines and forfeiture. In particular, these relationships included the clearing of hundreds of millions of U.S.-dollar transactions throguh correspondent accounts at financial institutions in Eurozone countries. In essence, these misrepresentations exposed the financial institutions to serious harm and denied the institutions the opportunity to make decisions based on the true risk of processing certain transaction and the reputations rik associated with banking high-risk clients such as Huawei!

这是指控的最核心部分，太水了。因为孟的陈述导致不知是哪里的银行，被我美国司法部处罚的潜在风险敞口，增大了。而且还让这些银行，还有欧洲的银行，向华为提供了跨国结算服务——孟你犯了严重的金融欺诈罪行！

看到没有“违反了这些银行的内部规定”，“潜在的可能使这些银行违反美国的禁运法案”，“增大了这些“受害者”的风险敞口”，这个指控连实际损害还没发生呢，就构成了严重的金融诈骗！

当然前提是，美帝指控的孟女士提供了虚假陈述构成诈骗，本身也是未必成立的。孟没有欺诈的目的，也没有欺诈的故意行为，仅仅是对一个公司控制权的认识上，依赖毕马威会计师事务所的专业认定。孟有欺诈吗？孟有过错吗？