主题:A国用国内法在B国抓了C国人。不是赤裸裸的霸权主义是什么 -- 友来有趣
如果孟女士是欺诈的刑事案件,第一行为人在中国;第二所谓受害人是汇丰银行还是香港成立的,大股东是中国公司的,就算是英资银行吧;第三,涉嫌犯罪行为地在中国境内,大陆或香港。这里和美国,加拿大有任何联系吗?长臂管辖可不是国际法上必然成立的管辖权原则!第四,孟女士的行为在香港,在大陆,在交易发生地,是否构成了犯罪???是否因为该陈述造成了汇丰银行与伊朗发生了事实上的金融交易,这是否在中国和中国香港构成犯罪。
看看这个美国人讲的,美国在本案中根本就没有国际法上管辖的连接点:
有一个提出管辖权问题的美国评论,见下 新
Paul Wolf
18小时前
There is the presumption against extraterritorial application of US laws, and also the question of jurisdiction over her case. She is a Chinese citizen and anything that she did wrong, she did in China. The case has no contacts at all with the US. China should make its own extradition request, so that Ms. Wanzhou can be tried in a Chinese court. A Canadian judge considering two competing extradition requests would have to determine which country has a greater interest in the case.
Although its doubtful that violating US sanctions against Iran is a crime in China, she's also accused of making false statements on bank loan applications, which probably is. (fraud) Even if the case against her is weak, she will be badly mistreated and imprisoned for years until it's resolved. 出处在华盛顿邮报的文章下评论里。链接在我另一个帖子里。
- 相关回复 上下关系8
压缩 2 层
🙂不懂法就别乱举例,贸易法是刑事犯罪吗?是世界刑警组织 28 瀚海黄沙 字2144 2018-12-10 04:58:18
🙂” A国用国内法在B国抓了C国人“这是您的原话 4 ErgoSum 字364 2018-12-10 05:04:53
🙂美国毕竟是法制国家,玩法律是玩的真漂亮。 2313234454dfsd 字84 2018-12-10 09:57:55
🙂这次怕是玩脱长臂管辖是一种超国土管辖的描述而并不必然有效
🙂如果你学国际法的朋友都没意见,那可能要相信专业意见,而不 2313234454dfsd 字334 2018-12-10 23:37:16
🙂你猜测错了我可没说“都”是,只是对某个人某表态失望而已。 3 瀚海黄沙 字645 2018-12-10 23:47:26
🙂都是成年人了,诛心之论能免则免。学术上有争论很正常 2313234454dfsd 字1996 2018-12-11 05:17:56
🙂我半夜上网专门跟你掰扯一下探讨一下法律问题 6 瀚海黄沙 字6699 2018-12-11 15:06:47