西西河

主题:纯技术贴:依照现有的资料,中医到底能治好什么病?请您讨论 -- 想象残酷

共:💬1054 🌺3045 🌵161
全看分页树展 · 主题 跟帖
家园 峰回路转?

恕我眼拙,我没看到你声明的“可证伪性只是科学方法Hypothesis下的必要属性”,我见你一直抱怨可证伪性的局限性,以为是你不接受这点。

既然你承认可证伪性在科学方法里是必须的,事情就简单了。

回到我给你的定义,英文就叫Scientific Method,翻译成科学方法,没问题吧?它里面的描述是这样的:

Scientific method is an empirical method of knowledge acquisition, which has characterized the development of natural science since at least the 17th century, involving careful observation, which includes rigorous skepticism about what one observes, given that cognitive assumptions about how the world works influence how one interprets a percept; formulating hypotheses, via induction, based on such observations; experimental testing and measurement of deductions drawn from the hypotheses; and refinement (or elimination) of the hypotheses based on the experimental findings. These are principles of the scientific method, as opposed to a definitive series of steps applicable to all scientific enterprises.[1][2][3]

接着后面又说了

A scientific hypothesis must be falsifiable, implying that it is possible to identify a possible outcome of an experiment or observation that conflicts with predictions deduced from the hypothesis; otherwise, the hypothesis cannot be meaningfully tested.[7]

简单来说,科学方法就是首先是根据观察,归纳出一个Hypothesis(猜想),并且要求这个Hypothesis(猜想)必须有证伪性,然后进行试验来验证这个Hypothesis(猜想)所推断的结果。

切记,我从来没有说过不需要事实检验,我强调的是,必须先具备可证伪性,才有可能用事实来检验Hypothesis(猜想)所推断的结果。正如上面所说的:“otherwise, the hypothesis cannot be meaningfully tested”

综上所述,你所谓的“可证实性”并非科学方法所强制要求的,而我,又从没想过用其他方法来进行辩论,那么,你问我可证伪性与可证实性区别又有何意义呢?说过几次了,我时间有限,实在不愿意花时间回应与科学方法无关的问题,并非逃避。

既然我要坚持要用这里定义的科学方法,我当然要咬紧可证伪性这点不放了,如果你有其他方法,不必使用Hypothesis(猜想),自然也就不必要求可证伪性了,那么请你把方法的名称亮出来,让河友们一起学习一下,想必你的方法,不会也叫科学方法(Scientific Method)吧?

全看分页树展 · 主题 跟帖


有趣有益,互惠互利;开阔视野,博采众长。
虚拟的网络,真实的人。天南地北客,相逢皆朋友

Copyright © cchere 西西河