主题:同样是系统集成设计,为什么喷运十不喷C919? -- 脊梁硬
对您这种人,我有那必要吗?我很赞赏您的务实精神,能会用GOOGLE查数据是不错的,但您也得知道怎么解读数据吧?1939美国名义GDP俩千亿和美国国会拨款四千亿有冲突吗?
数据来自 “Where’s the Money Coming from? Problems of Postwar Finance”, Stuart Chase (1943)原文如下:
In 1939, the United States Congress declined to appropriate $4 billions for highways, conservation, hospitals, freight cars, in the bitterly contested “lend-spend” bill. It was widely held that the bill would lead to ruin and national bankruptcy. Yet since the fall of France in 1940, Congress has appropriated almost $300 billions for armaments – seventy-five times as much as the lend-spend bill – and a large fraction of it has already gone into tanks and guns. Far from being ruined, our national vitality has never been more vigorous, and great financial moguls assure us that we shall be able to swing the national debt.
Where did the money come from?
我今天刚看到BILL MITCCHELL 教授的一篇文章,觉得和讨论有关,就转述了一段,原连接如下 http://bilbo.economicoutlook.net/blog/?p=36218#more-36218
- 相关回复 上下关系8
压缩 2 层
🙂充分是相对于有效购买力而言的 1 老老狐狸 字81 2017-06-26 21:00:47
🙂我就知道有人又要扯什么常识 7 bshu 字367 2017-06-13 10:47:52
🙂你可以不懂,但不要说谎 3 豪哥的江湖 字159 2017-06-13 19:07:06
🙂您不觉得您把自几看得太高了吗?
🙂"专家”这个名头就是被你这样的歪嘴搞臭大街的 2 豪哥的江湖 字550 2017-06-14 09:49:42
🙂专家的帽子我可得还给您 3 bshu 字905 2017-06-15 09:36:49
🙂财政部大笔一挥,钱就从空气中变到运十的账号上了 4 qianji 字194 2017-06-13 07:06:38
🙂待认可未通过。偏要看