主题:【整理】西方历史与学术的由来——关于西方历史的真假问题 -- 疯狂的蚂蚁
共:💬57 🌺271
The main problem is that when OP tried to talk about history, it is very unprofessional, almost purely 伪科学
Every single accusation is at best full of factually and logical errors, if not outright wrong.
The desire to challenge Western ideaological hegemony is understandable and even appreciative, but go about using methods that may discredit yourself is silly.
- 相关回复 上下关系8
🙂看你这么一说,难道我到了第二个层次 4 中三浪 字444 2014-06-15 16:55:40
🙂三、当代中国人的史观(附四) 12 疯狂的蚂蚁 字8487 2014-06-13 17:10:09
🙂这是严肃的学术论文,还是随想? 1 直面人生 字856 2014-06-14 13:47:14
🙂OP has problems
🙂Please be specific. erha 字0 2014-11-03 16:55:31
🙂你这段话也可以对CNN说 疯狂的蚂蚁 字78 2014-06-19 01:32:54
🙂必然不可能是学术论文了,是很久以前的网帖 1 疯狂的蚂蚁 字703 2014-06-15 05:22:35
🙂well ... 虎王2006 字233 2014-06-18 14:22:20