主题:【原创】一些凌乱的想法,想到哪说到哪 -- puma2011
global player in GLOBAL politics for 300 years. Just like Roman elites 2000 years ago, UK elites played nations like masters played chess.
Before Chinese, there were Spanish empire, Sweden, France, Germany, Turkish empire, all mid-east tribes, all Indian kings/khans, Russian empire, etc. All defeated by UK one by one along the path of history. As an overseas Chinese, I was still impressed by the awe enjoyed by the Flag Jack in Latin America, India-Pakistan and mid-east. English elites learned to convert its disadvantage as a multi-ethnic nation (scots, celtic, Welsh, etc) into a great advantage: expertise in managing a multi-cultural empire.
Chinese elites, in the past 300 years, have barely stepped out of their own national boundary. The troubling sign is that decades after 1949, Han Chinese ruling elites (不如满族统治者)still could not handle two minority regions: Tibet and Xingjiang. Out of the national boundary, I can barely see diplomatic success of Chinese Han elites in Vietnam, North Korea, Mongolia, Burma, Thailand (look at what happened to the recent pro-China Thai PM), Laos, Cambodia, or in Afganistan, or other mid-Asia muslim nations. One failure after another.
I hope I can have confidence just like 五毛们 on this forum. But bloody cold facts do not help at all. 五毛们嘴巴硬有屁用。
- 相关回复 上下关系8
压缩 3 层
🙂Chinese elites 8 Vortex 字373 2014-05-24 04:41:36
🙂80,90年代那些不算elite 1 原手 字303 2014-05-24 12:55:58
🙂小心美国玩英国人那一手 3 原手 字161 2014-05-22 23:33:10
🙂UK has been a successful
🙂UK 12 Vortex 字2092 2014-05-26 00:57:14
🙂现在英国还能不能存在都成问题了 tint 字364 2014-09-17 17:03:25
🙂Flower you, but can't agree 卢比扬卡 字1058 2014-09-06 05:26:32
🙂Yay 1 玩牌也 字99 2014-06-26 09:00:46