主题:【原创】围绕脑科学而发生的若干玄想 -- 鸿乾
girls like competitive guys due to girls reproduction systems特征, competitive=money, power, etc, show me the money, in 社会场;
社会场 is a non "canonical (平衡正則) system" by definition: if nothing else, humanity needs to figure out an exit(from earth) strategy within next 1k years, where is the exit strategy? no, so all the social "canonical (平衡正則) system" basically=garbage, humanity crying for innovation, hating entropy!
物理学家 knows that too, but all their "AI", "么正性,因果关系, gauge, 測度, 度規" models are all pretty much based on all kinds of "canonical (平衡正則) system" and their various "wave" derivative forms, with no or weak interactions, they know very little about "full interaction model".
with strong or full interactions @global, "系综, 么正性, 因果关系,gauge, 測度, 度規, etc, the key physics/math aspects of the core of the white logic" all will be "destroyed", 1)爱因斯坦 gr's point of view, 2)and 热力学极限下相變, professor Li &Yang
so, AI has to be "social", and AI MIT meeting you commented did not have PHYSICISTs like Frank A. Wilczek participation, and google's statistical left over from physics cannot handle "full interaction", and nobody can handle "full interaction" in physics anyway, so AI=day dream, as long as full interaction model=still in dream;
欧美社会logic has to figure out issues such as low growth,high unemployment with US top 1% population=50% of us equity and bond ownership, huge cost spent for those us sys admin/top social scientists, and where is the innovation and exit strategy, except fed's qe?
so social sys admins=mostly top social scientists, and sys admin makes good money, girls like them;
and because of lack of "full interaction" model not even in physics, 山中無老虎,猴子稱大王, tg as china's top social scientists=king of china kingdom, 4 ever?
and from humanity sys admin point of view, system may need tg as a competition and a challenge to the white logic, pressuring the white to innovate/progress faster, and faster!
but fundamentally, although 塔山阻击战's kind of role assingment is good for tg, 人海战术 (as waste of human & environmental capital) model might not be good at all for the Chinese nation and Chinese people long term , 北京共识 is a fake, tg knows that, but what to do? for now, it gives tg some kind of 执政合法性, global humanity sys admin needs some one to play 藍军 role, and 藍军 happens to be tg.
北京共识 as a head fake("double top")=we may have seen the first top economically already, 2nd top=城镇化, tg's战略预备队, tg will work it out, one way or another, at lease 10 years of steady economic growth as a result, during x&l term, and that is very positive to world economy which is thirsty for growth, white like that, and for that and other reasons, white will work with tg, etc , 茉莉花 revolution almost impossible in china anyway, if you can't beat tg anyway, you better not even try, economics is more important to white anyway, they have to get their econ house together. top priority for them.
by the way, professor 杨 is a social smarty too, I thing between him and his father, they figured out a highly profitable "exit & re-entry" strategy to deal with tg's top 人精; look at those 两弹一星元勋二代, did tg二代 bother to share some happy hour/parties with them?
as the language post author said, 驕傲 is in our Chinese blood, those overseas "两弹一星元勋N代" will come back with 后发优势 copies to china, to narrow the science and technology gap between tg and the white, almost automatically, due to their Chinese blood systems特征 (惯性,静质量,花崗岩 culture brain, 6k years formation): 驕傲 is in our Chinese blood, the language post author made a very good observation, regardless of his political view,if he has one
--[PDF]
破缺的宇称 - 李政道主页
tdlee.ccast.ac.cn/TDbook/8BrokenParity.pdf - 轉為繁體網頁
檔案類型: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - 快速檢視
自然, 我们的讨论就很快集中到将伊辛结果向气-液相变 ... 很快杨和我严格证明了几个有关相变的定理,做出了具有实 ... 他首先询问我们关于巨正则系统的基础。显 ...
- 相关回复 上下关系8
压缩 6 层
🙂我觉得可以设计一个试验来验证 益者三友 字535 2013-04-16 18:08:08
🙂永久记忆=熔断突触形成,肾上腺素注射促进触突的快速熔断 晓兵 字5225 2013-04-16 20:13:38
🙂electrons and holes recombin 川普 字26 2013-04-17 22:53:15
🙂no money, no honey
🙂这些乱七八糟的哲学物理机制,正是我反对的 2 益者三友 字433 2013-04-16 21:34:39
🙂自然場,社会场; 自然人,社会人; 晓兵 字1103 2013-04-16 22:17:24
🙂我坚决支持mailsina的话:讨论科学时,任何名词都要 3 益者三友 字185 2013-04-16 22:29:33
🙂full interaction model 晓兵 字95 2013-04-16 22:39:20