主题：【原创】围绕脑科学而发生的若干玄想 -- 鸿乾
共:💬461 🌺824 🌵2
better.
if we try to analyze things too closely, we risk not understanding how they work on a macro level. In many cases, the whole exhibits properties that can't be explained by the behavior of its parts. As Laughlin points out, we use computers and internal combustion engines every day, but scientists don't totally understand why all of their parts work the way they do
这本书很值得一读 A Different Universe: Reinventing Physics from the Bottom Down
另外，还可以看看Rule 110 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_110
这是一个有意思的例子解释了原理并不能预测结果的道理，这本书叫《A New Kind of Science》 by Wolfram.
- 相关回复 上下关系8
🙂Moravec的悖论 10 川普 字3601 2013-01-25 19:08:59
🙂所谓“Moravec悖论”连悖论都不是。 Matt 字89 2013-04-10 17:08:38
🙂neurons"="electrons & photon 晓兵 字1081 2013-02-04 18:33:01
🙂smaller is not necessarily
🙂QH=热辐射中包含着一个物体的全息信息 1 晓兵 字4308 2013-02-04 19:04:08
🙂那么人是信息的永动机吗？ 墨虎 字20 2013-04-28 01:00:54
🙂Verlinde's 全息屏 1 晓兵 字1688 2013-04-28 03:09:17
🙂:引力波"屏蔽干扰 1 晓兵 字582 2013-02-04 21:14:16