主题：【文摘】武广高铁试运营56天票价收入7亿 远超早前预期 -- 履虎

All the followed analysis

which is based on my past years of hand-on experiences on the audit works on construction programs can be simply attributed to this negative words: "臆测“? I cannot accept this humiliating tone. Please take these words back. Thanks in advance.

And regarding your evidence, 对公贷款利率是有法定低限的，即基准利率下浮不得超过10%? Are you 100% for sure that this evidence can lead to your result: 现有的数据只能得出严重亏损的结论呀? I seriously doubt about the reasoning process! You even do not provide me the start time of paying back the loan!

(Furthermore, the evidence itself is still doubtful. It seems that you still believe each rule could be obeyed very well. Do not be so childish, man. It is the real world. Everything is possible.)

Oh, and with regard to the words you just used: "巨额亏损", "严重亏损"... Could you be some kind to define these words first? To what extent the "亏损" could be termed as "严重亏损"？ lose 100% ,50% or 10%?

====================================================

我说你是臆测，很简单呀，你只能是想象，没什么数据支持，比如说，你说有农民工因为享受要改做高铁！但是你拿不出任何数据支持！我可以说只有1万，你可以说1000万，这个无法证实，因为没有任何数据！

而我的算法，确实有坚实的数据支持的，有实在的现有的运营数据！

对公贷款利率是有法定低限的，即基准利率下浮不得超过10%?我是业内人士，我当然知道了！你可以举出武广铁路的利息成本是低于基准利率10%的证据出来呀！其实这个你随便找家有贷款的公司问下，你看看谁能拿到基准利率下浮超过10%的贷款不就得了么！很简单，也不复杂呀！

至于按我的算法，一年连利息都无法收回的投资，你执着的关注于用词到底是亏损还是严重亏损有什么意义呢！